simple_language@yahoo.com

source: http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=2150

Ever since World War II, we have been driven by a passionate desire to
understand how mass genocide, terror states and global war came about
– and how we can prevent them in the future.

Above all, we have sought answers to several basic questions: Why did
the West fail to see the coming of the catastrophe? Why were there so
few efforts to thwart the fascist tide, and why did virtually all
Western leaders, and so many Western intellectuals, treat the fascists
as if they were normal political leaders, instead of the virulent
revolutionaries they really were? Why did the main designated victims
– the Jews – similarly fail to recognize the magnitude of their
impending doom? Why was resistance so rare?

Most eventually accepted a twofold "explanation": the uniqueness of
the evil, and the lack of historical precedent for it. Italy and
Germany were two of the most civilized and cultured nations in the
world. It was difficult to appreciate that a great evil had become
paramount in the countries that had produced Kant, Beethoven, Dante
and Rossini.

How could Western leaders, let alone the victims, be blamed for
failing to see something that was almost totally new – systematic mass
murder on a vast scale, and a threat to civilization itself? Never
before had there been such an organized campaign to destroy an entire
"race," and it was therefore almost impossible to see it coming, or
even to recognize it as it got under way.

The failure to understand what was happening took a well-known form: a
systematic refusal to view our enemies plain. Hitler's rants, whether
in "Mein Kampf" or at Nazi Party rallies, were often downplayed as
"politics," a way of maintaining popular support. They were rarely
taken seriously as solemn promises he fully intended to fulfill.
Mussolini's call for the creation of a new Italian Empire, and his
later alliance with Hitler, were often downplayed as mere bluster, or
even excused on the grounds that, since other European countries had
overseas territories, why not Italy?

Some scholars broadened the analysis to include other evil regimes,
such as Stalin's Russia, which also systematically murdered millions
of people and whose ambitions similarly threatened the West. Just as
with fascism, most contemporaries found it nearly impossible to
believe that the Gulag Archipelago was what it was. And just as with
fascism, we studied it so that the next time we would see evil early
enough to prevent it from threatening us again.

By now, there is very little we do not know about such regimes, and
such movements. Some of our greatest scholars have described them,
analyzed the reasons for their success, and chronicled the wars we
fought to defeat them. Our understanding is considerable, as is the
honesty and intensity of our desire that such things must be
prevented.

Yet they are with us again, and we are acting as we did in the last
century. The world is simmering in the familiar rhetoric and actions
of movements and regimes – from Hezbollah and al Qaeda to the Iranian
Khomeinists and the Saudi Wahhabis – who swear to destroy us and
others like us. Like their 20th-century predecessors, they openly
proclaim their intentions, and carry them out whenever and wherever
they can. Like our own 20th-century predecessors, we rarely take them
seriously or act accordingly. More often than not, we downplay the
consequences of their words, as if they were some Islamic or Arab
version of "politics," intended for internal consumption, and designed
to accomplish domestic objectives.

Clearly, the explanations we gave for our failure to act in the last
century were wrong. The rise of messianic mass movements is not new,
and there is very little we do not know about them. Nor is there any
excuse for us to be surprised at the success of evil leaders, even in
countries with long histories and great cultural and political
accomplishments. We know all about that. So we need to ask the old
questions again. Why are we failing to see the mounting power of evil
enemies? Why do we treat them as if they were normal political
phenomena, as Western leaders do when they embrace negotiations as the
best course of action?

No doubt there are many reasons. One is the deep-seated belief that
all people are basically the same, and all are basically good. Most
human history, above all the history of the last century, points in
the opposite direction. But it is unpleasant to accept the fact that
many people are evil, and entire cultures, even the finest, can fall
prey to evil leaders and march in lockstep to their commands. Much of
contemporary Western culture is deeply committed to a belief in the
goodness of all mankind; we are reluctant to abandon that reassuring
article of faith. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, we prefer
to pursue the path of reasonableness, even with enemies whose
thoroughly unreasonable fanaticism is manifest.

This is not merely a philosophical issue, for to accept the threat to
us means – short of a policy of national suicide – acting against it.
As it did in the 20th century, it means war. It means that,
temporarily at least, we have to make sacrifices on many fronts: in
the comforts of our lives, indeed in lives lost, in the domestic focus
of our passions – careers derailed and personal freedoms subjected to
unpleasant and even dangerous restrictions – and the diversion of
wealth from self-satisfaction to the instruments of power. All of this
is painful; even the contemplation of it hurts.

Then there is anti-Semitism. Old Jew-hating texts like "The Protocols
of the Elders of Zion," now in Farsi and Arabic, are proliferating
throughout the Middle East. Calls for the destruction of the Jews
appear regularly on Iranian, Egyptian, Saudi and Syrian television and
are heard in European and American mosques. There is little if any
condemnation from the West, and virtually no action against it,
suggesting, at a minimum, a familiar Western indifference to the fate
of the Jews.

Finally, there is the nature of our political system. None of the
democracies adequately prepared for war before it was unleashed on
them in the 1940s. None was prepared for the terror assault of the
21st century. The nature of Western politics makes it very difficult
for national leaders – even those rare men and women who see what is
happening and want to act – to take timely, prudent measures before
war is upon them. Leaders like Winston Churchill are relegated to the
opposition until the battle is unavoidable. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
had to fight desperately to win Congressional approval for a national
military draft a few months before Pearl Harbor.

Then, as now, the initiative lies with the enemies of the West. Even
today, when we are engaged on the battlefields of Iraq and
Afghanistan, there is little apparent recognition that we are under
attack by a familiar sort of enemy, and great reluctance to act
accordingly. This time, ignorance cannot be claimed as an excuse. If
we are defeated, it will be because of failure of will, not lack of
understanding. As, indeed, was almost the case with our near-defeat in
the 1940s.

Anarchore

The Neocon and Zionist madness is spreading. Media control means that
most people support at least some of these planks no matter what their
ideology. It has been so drilled into Canadians’ heads that they
believe it. The more weak-minded the person, the more of these insane
and destructive markers will be internalized as their belief system. No
one who has been brainwashed ever realized it as it was happening, but
the good news is that it can be reversed. All it takes is lifting the
veil on facts the Zionofascist media refuses to show.


http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/about/


What is Zionofascism?

What is Zionofascism? by Anarchore

Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are necessarily
Zionofascists. One does not have to be Jewish to be a Zionofascist.


Ahmadinejad is Hitler, the solution is to nuke Iran– Zionofascist radio
host Michael Savage

Islamofascism Threatens the West so we must Attack Muslims

You may be familiar with the compound word ‘Islamofascism’. It was
coined by the Jewish Neocon talk radio pitbull Michael Savage, to
describe a fundamentalist Islamic ideology of conquest. We are all in
danger of annihilation by the Islamic hordes, says Michael Savage. Not
surprizingly, Mr Savage has recently been calling for nuclear strikes
against Iran. President Ahmadinejad is the next Hitler, says Mr Savage.

While there may indeed be some people and regimes who could be
categorized as Islamofascist, they are not much of a threat to us.
Saudi Arabia is ruled by a brutal Islamofascist regime that hosts US
airbases and is friendly toward the US, for one example.

What Mr Savage and others who have Israel as their first loyalty want
to distract us from is that Zionofascism is the prevailing ideology in
US and Canadian political/mainstream media discourse.

Zionist Occupied Governments(ZOG)


The Israel Lobby controls US foreign policy

One of Zionofascism’s effects is the tendency to put the interests of
Israel to the fore even when supporting such interests is damaging to
your country’s economy, the freedom of it’s people, and it’s
international stature. Bush, Harper, and Blair/Brown are following the
Zionofascist Neocon ideology. With the election of Sarkozy, France has
now fallen to ZOG as well.

The Zionofascist Sarkozy is now President of France

We see that Canada is now a full-blown Zionist Occupied Government.
Canada has lately been changing it’s UN votes in favour of Israel.
Canadian troops are fighting Israel’s enemies in Afghanistan. Canadian
politicians in the Liberal and Conservative parties are openly Zionist.

This came to a head in July of 2006, when Israel bombed the civlilian
infrastructure of Lebanon. They bombed apartment buildings in Beirut
claiming they held Hezbollah missiles, even though Beirut is too far to
launch attacks into Israel. They attacked people fleeing their homes,
and killed those inside their homes, including a family of 7 Canadians.
Harper couldn’t wait to excuse Israel’s actions, and when they murdered
a Canadian UN Peacekeeper Harper was quick to excuse them for that as
well. Full story: Canada’s Zionist Politicians

Civilized countries don’t torture. Israel does. Now the US does as
well(Actually the US has been torturing people for decades, but now
they say it is good to torture if you call it ‘pressure’ instead).


Abu Gharib: The Israelis really know how to keep the Arab troublemakers
in line


Israeli guard at Abu Gharib Prison

Civilized countries don’t engage in collective punishment against
communities. Israel does, bombing villages and starving the
Palestinians. So does the US in Iraq. So –thanks to Zionofascism– does
Canada in Afghanistan, calling in air strikes on villages of ‘Taliban’.

Some identifying markers of Zionofascism
Each of these planks of the Zionofascist agenda supports and reinforces
other aspects of their control

Anti-Jewish

Zionists, who come from the Jewish faith, have not been the best
friends to Jews. Rather, they are willing to sacrifice Jews in order to
maintain power. Their power comes from fear –both in Israel where they
make sure there is no chance of peace– and where-ever Zionists hold
power. Zionists established The State of Israel, which has seen brutal
terror against the Palestinians ever since. Yet Judaism says that
Israel shall not be a state until the Messiah comes. So “Israel” the
state is blasphemous.

Media control

Fifth Columnists: The NaZionist(National Zionist) Post Publishes False
News
Shape the news and you shape people’s thoughts. The Zionofascist agenda
cannot be realized without control of the public mind, and they now
control almost all mainstream media.

Control/corruption of politicians
Powerful Zionofascist lobbying groups like the US AIPAC and the
Canadian CJPAC work to change the role of politicians from looking
after the best interests of their people to acting in the interests of
the terrorist Israeli regime. Together with Zionofascist media control,
they make and break politicians in Canada and the US.

CJPAC is a unique national, grassroots, independent organization
whose mandate is to engage the community in the political process.
CJPAC will mobilize the grassroots across the country, build
relationships with elected officials – of all political parties – and
work for Jewish community interests, on a multi-partisan basis, during
and between elections.

Unflinching support of The State of Israel
Through their control of news media the Zionofascists have a lot of
control of the Jewish(and non-Jewish) collective mind. They exploit
Jews’ feelings of kinship with their people to justify supporting The
State of Israel, and hide the brutal actions the Zionist state engages
in. Israel’s brutality is not shown, but when it cannot be hidden, it’s
actions are always justified self-defense to protect it from
terrorists. Anyone critical of Israel is suspected of anti-semitism.

Illogical/psychotic non-sequitors as foreign policy


Kootenay Neocon MP Jim Abbott, clown or fool?

The lunatics have taken over the asylum. There is no logical
justification for Zionofascist foreign policy, so leaders resort to
blatant nonsense. Attacking and occupying sovereign countries who never
threatened us will make us safer, say our Zionofascist leaders.

“You are either with us or you are against us.” -George W Bush
“Israel’s values are Canada’s values”- former Liberal Prime
Minister Paul Martin
“You can fight them in Kandahar or you can fight them in Kamloops”
-Kootenay Neocon MP Jim Abbott
“A threat on Israel is a threat on Canada” - Neocon Foreign Affairs
Minister Peter Mackay

The police state triumphs, basic rights and freedoms are curtailed
The government attacks centuries of legal precedence. As in Israel,
Habeus Corpus is suspended and guilt or innocence is made irrelevant.
All it takes is the accusation. Torture is rehabilitated as a tool to
preserve freedom that saves lives. Fear of terrorism is the
justification. They call it the post-9/11 era.

War on Terror
The War on Terror is the justification for support of Israel, because
Israel is surrounded by Islamofascists who want to destroy it. So say
Zionofascists like Michael Savage. As in Israel, terror fears are
played up so the racket known as the War on Terror would continue to
generate large contracts for companies like Haliburton. State and
corporate cohesion was a factor in fascism in Germany and Italy, no
different than the Zionofascism of today.

State terrorism/false flags/terror hoaxes
Israel has been caught numerous times carrying out terror attacks that
they attempted to blame on Arabs. The dancing Israeli Mossad agents who
were celebrating while videotaping the twin towers burning is one
glaring example, showing Israel at least had prior knowledge and was
thereby complicit.

With Canada’s elites drifting towards the Zionist way of thinking,
liberties are regarded as threats, individuals are irrelevant and
everyone is in danger of political violence from state thugs, possibly
only for the reason of having the same name as someone on a no-fly
list. As Zionists gains power, the people in affected countries are
subjected to false flag terror events or ‘near miss’ hoaxes designed to
spread fear of Arabs.
Two recent examples are the June 2006 busts of careless internet
chatting Muslim teens in Toronto, and the “liquid bomb plot”, laughable
cases that were no threat at all. Yet it was all over the news, with
media somehow finding out about the Toronto arrests before they
happened so they could splash scary photos of police with automatic
weapons and scenarios of skinny Muslim teens storming Parliament and
decapitating the Prime Minister.

The liquid bomb plot where chemicals where supposedly going to be mixed
together onboard jetliners was exposed as impossible the moment the
story aired, yet that did not stop international air travel from being
disrupted and Zionofascists Blair, Harper and Bush to grandstand about
the War on Terror..

Proxy wars for Israel
According to the prevailing view, Saudi hijackers brought down the
World Trade Center. Bush set sights on Afghanistan, declaring Bin Laden
was the culprit.. He had no evidence, so the Taliban refused to turn
him over. The Zionofascist media actively concealed this fact, and so
are responsible for distracting from the real perpetrators of 9/11
-Zionofascists. After the criminal US invasion Canada was drawn in,
supposedly to help out with reconstruction. Now Canadian troops are
fighting the enemies of The State of Israel. Support for proxy wars for
Israel such as Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran is the signature of the
uninformed, the stupid, or the Zionofascist.

(Anarchore: I’m not sure about these two points, though vdare.com has
made the case in the US. I have not found proof that it is Zionism and
not Trudeauite liberalism that is responsible)
——————————————————————————————————————
Mass third world immigration
To conquer a people, they must first be divided or even replaced. To
achieve this end, people are brought from the poorest countries of the
world into European and European-founded countries. This increases
stress for those who have to compete with the new arrivals for jobs and
housing, and brings up crime levels. The new arrivals may not speak
English, may have AIDs or other diseases, and are from parts of the
world where corruption is normal and people disappear for political
reasons. This is good for Zionofascists. It is much harder to organize
a resistance to tyrrany when a country is Balkanized into ethnic
enclaves. Scratch a mass immigration advocate and you may find a
Zionofascist.

Cultural Marxism/destruction of culture
Along with mass immigration changing the nature of society, the minds
of those who are to be replaced must be moulded to accept this and even
to celebrate it. The history of Europeans or whites is associated with
colonialism and the misery that our people brought to the world.
Perversion and hedonism is encouraged by Zionofascist owned media.
Multiculturalism is pushed as a state value. The ‘melting pot’ of the
US has increasing numbers of third world enclaves.
——————————————————————————————————————–

Blood libel against European people: constant reminders of the Holocaust
It is as though Jews were the only people who ever suffered throughout
history. Holocaust memorials are built, and state leaders attend
ceremonies or make solemn speeches to Jewish groups. The slogan “never
again” is invoked –but not because the concept of genocide is so
abhorrent to them– it is to make Jews think that they could be subject
to renewed persecution at any time, and at the same time shame the
gentiles into shutting their mouths about Zionofascism. No discussion
of the Holocaust is permitted, even though much of the story as told
does not make sense. The Jew Stalin’s Russia –where his Bolshevik Jews
killed far more than even the claimed six million of the Holocaust– is
never mentioned. More: Sever Plocker on Stalin’s Jews World European
Holocaust Week

Banning of anti-Zionofascist speech such as “Holocaust denial”, or
“hate speech”
Zionofascist pressure groups like the ADL push for speech banning
‘hate’. This Stalinist technique of silencing dissent effective in the
Jewish-run Soviet Union. Today Zionofascists use a variety of methods
to silence dissent, when they can’t enforce outright bans on speech..

The Neocon and Zionist madness is spreading. Media control means that
most people support at least some of these planks no matter what their
ideology. It has been so drilled into Canadians’ heads that they
believe it. The more weak-minded the person, the more of these insane
and destructive markers will be internalized as their belief system. No
one who has been brainwashed ever realized it as it was happening, but
the good news is that it can be reversed. All it takes is lifting the
veil on facts the Zionofascist media refuses to show.

Enter the Internet Resistance.

¯Doug¦Ç

Yeah, those less than 20 million Jews worldwide sure to
get around don't they? It must be their superhuman powers.

I never knew psychotic delusions were contagious.

"Anarchore" <e@t.me> wrote in message
news:cZKdnXl9laiUUdfVnZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@posted.unise rvecommunications...
> The Neocon and Zionist madness is spreading. Media control means that
> most people support at least some of these planks no matter what their
> ideology. It has been so drilled into Canadians' heads that they
> believe it. The more weak-minded the person, the more of these insane
> and destructive markers will be internalized as their belief system. No
> one who has been brainwashed ever realized it as it was happening, but
> the good news is that it can be reversed. All it takes is lifting the
> veil on facts the Zionofascist media refuses to show.
>
>
> http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/about/
>
>
> What is Zionofascism?
>
> What is Zionofascism? by Anarchore
>
> Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are necessarily
> Zionofascists. One does not have to be Jewish to be a Zionofascist.
>
>
> Ahmadinejad is Hitler, the solution is to nuke Iran- Zionofascist radio
> host Michael Savage
>
> Islamofascism Threatens the West so we must Attack Muslims
>
> You may be familiar with the compound word 'Islamofascism'. It was
> coined by the Jewish Neocon talk radio pitbull Michael Savage, to
> describe a fundamentalist Islamic ideology of conquest. We are all in
> danger of annihilation by the Islamic hordes, says Michael Savage. Not
> surprizingly, Mr Savage has recently been calling for nuclear strikes
> against Iran. President Ahmadinejad is the next Hitler, says Mr Savage.
>
> While there may indeed be some people and regimes who could be
> categorized as Islamofascist, they are not much of a threat to us.
> Saudi Arabia is ruled by a brutal Islamofascist regime that hosts US
> airbases and is friendly toward the US, for one example.
>
> What Mr Savage and others who have Israel as their first loyalty want
> to distract us from is that Zionofascism is the prevailing ideology in
> US and Canadian political/mainstream media discourse.
>
> Zionist Occupied Governments(ZOG)
>
>
> The Israel Lobby controls US foreign policy
>
> One of Zionofascism's effects is the tendency to put the interests of
> Israel to the fore even when supporting such interests is damaging to
> your country's economy, the freedom of it's people, and it's
> international stature. Bush, Harper, and Blair/Brown are following the
> Zionofascist Neocon ideology. With the election of Sarkozy, France has
> now fallen to ZOG as well.
>
> The Zionofascist Sarkozy is now President of France
>
> We see that Canada is now a full-blown Zionist Occupied Government.
> Canada has lately been changing it's UN votes in favour of Israel.
> Canadian troops are fighting Israel's enemies in Afghanistan. Canadian
> politicians in the Liberal and Conservative parties are openly Zionist.
>
> This came to a head in July of 2006, when Israel bombed the civlilian
> infrastructure of Lebanon. They bombed apartment buildings in Beirut
> claiming they held Hezbollah missiles, even though Beirut is too far to
> launch attacks into Israel. They attacked people fleeing their homes,
> and killed those inside their homes, including a family of 7 Canadians.
> Harper couldn't wait to excuse Israel's actions, and when they murdered
> a Canadian UN Peacekeeper Harper was quick to excuse them for that as
> well. Full story: Canada's Zionist Politicians
>
> Civilized countries don't torture. Israel does. Now the US does as
> well(Actually the US has been torturing people for decades, but now
> they say it is good to torture if you call it 'pressure' instead).
>
>
> Abu Gharib: The Israelis really know how to keep the Arab troublemakers
> in line
>
>
> Israeli guard at Abu Gharib Prison
>
> Civilized countries don't engage in collective punishment against
> communities. Israel does, bombing villages and starving the
> Palestinians. So does the US in Iraq. So -thanks to Zionofascism- does
> Canada in Afghanistan, calling in air strikes on villages of 'Taliban'.
>
> Some identifying markers of Zionofascism
> Each of these planks of the Zionofascist agenda supports and reinforces
> other aspects of their control
>
> Anti-Jewish
>
> Zionists, who come from the Jewish faith, have not been the best
> friends to Jews. Rather, they are willing to sacrifice Jews in order to
> maintain power. Their power comes from fear -both in Israel where they
> make sure there is no chance of peace- and where-ever Zionists hold
> power. Zionists established The State of Israel, which has seen brutal
> terror against the Palestinians ever since. Yet Judaism says that
> Israel shall not be a state until the Messiah comes. So "Israel" the
> state is blasphemous.
>
> Media control
>
> Fifth Columnists: The NaZionist(National Zionist) Post Publishes False
> News
> Shape the news and you shape people's thoughts. The Zionofascist agenda
> cannot be realized without control of the public mind, and they now
> control almost all mainstream media.
>
> Control/corruption of politicians
> Powerful Zionofascist lobbying groups like the US AIPAC and the
> Canadian CJPAC work to change the role of politicians from looking
> after the best interests of their people to acting in the interests of
> the terrorist Israeli regime. Together with Zionofascist media control,
> they make and break politicians in Canada and the US.
>
> CJPAC is a unique national, grassroots, independent organization
> whose mandate is to engage the community in the political process.
> CJPAC will mobilize the grassroots across the country, build
> relationships with elected officials - of all political parties - and
> work for Jewish community interests, on a multi-partisan basis, during
> and between elections.
>
> Unflinching support of The State of Israel
> Through their control of news media the Zionofascists have a lot of
> control of the Jewish(and non-Jewish) collective mind. They exploit
> Jews' feelings of kinship with their people to justify supporting The
> State of Israel, and hide the brutal actions the Zionist state engages
> in. Israel's brutality is not shown, but when it cannot be hidden, it's
> actions are always justified self-defense to protect it from
> terrorists. Anyone critical of Israel is suspected of anti-semitism.
>
> Illogical/psychotic non-sequitors as foreign policy
>
>
> Kootenay Neocon MP Jim Abbott, clown or fool?
>
> The lunatics have taken over the asylum. There is no logical
> justification for Zionofascist foreign policy, so leaders resort to
> blatant nonsense. Attacking and occupying sovereign countries who never
> threatened us will make us safer, say our Zionofascist leaders.
>
> "You are either with us or you are against us." -George W Bush
> "Israel's values are Canada's values"- former Liberal Prime
> Minister Paul Martin
> "You can fight them in Kandahar or you can fight them in Kamloops"
> -Kootenay Neocon MP Jim Abbott
> "A threat on Israel is a threat on Canada" - Neocon Foreign Affairs
> Minister Peter Mackay
>
> The police state triumphs, basic rights and freedoms are curtailed
> The government attacks centuries of legal precedence. As in Israel,
> Habeus Corpus is suspended and guilt or innocence is made irrelevant.
> All it takes is the accusation. Torture is rehabilitated as a tool to
> preserve freedom that saves lives. Fear of terrorism is the
> justification. They call it the post-9/11 era.
>
> War on Terror
> The War on Terror is the justification for support of Israel, because
> Israel is surrounded by Islamofascists who want to destroy it. So say
> Zionofascists like Michael Savage. As in Israel, terror fears are
> played up so the racket known as the War on Terror would continue to
> generate large contracts for companies like Haliburton. State and
> corporate cohesion was a factor in fascism in Germany and Italy, no
> different than the Zionofascism of today.
>
> State terrorism/false flags/terror hoaxes
> Israel has been caught numerous times carrying out terror attacks that
> they attempted to blame on Arabs. The dancing Israeli Mossad agents who
> were celebrating while videotaping the twin towers burning is one
> glaring example, showing Israel at least had prior knowledge and was
> thereby complicit.
>
> With Canada's elites drifting towards the Zionist way of thinking,
> liberties are regarded as threats, individuals are irrelevant and
> everyone is in danger of political violence from state thugs, possibly
> only for the reason of having the same name as someone on a no-fly
> list. As Zionists gains power, the people in affected countries are
> subjected to false flag terror events or 'near miss' hoaxes designed to
> spread fear of Arabs.
> Two recent examples are the June 2006 busts of careless internet
> chatting Muslim teens in Toronto, and the "liquid bomb plot", laughable
> cases that were no threat at all. Yet it was all over the news, with
> media somehow finding out about the Toronto arrests before they
> happened so they could splash scary photos of police with automatic
> weapons and scenarios of skinny Muslim teens storming Parliament and
> decapitating the Prime Minister.
>
> The liquid bomb plot where chemicals where supposedly going to be mixed
> together onboard jetliners was exposed as impossible the moment the
> story aired, yet that did not stop international air travel from being
> disrupted and Zionofascists Blair, Harper and Bush to grandstand about
> the War on Terror..
>
> Proxy wars for Israel
> According to the prevailing view, Saudi hijackers brought down the
> World Trade Center. Bush set sights on Afghanistan, declaring Bin Laden
> was the culprit.. He had no evidence, so the Taliban refused to turn
> him over. The Zionofascist media actively concealed this fact, and so
> are responsible for distracting from the real perpetrators of 9/11
> -Zionofascists. After the criminal US invasion Canada was drawn in,
> supposedly to help out with reconstruction. Now Canadian troops are
> fighting the enemies of The State of Israel. Support for proxy wars for
> Israel such as Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran is the signature of the
> uninformed, the stupid, or the Zionofascist.
>
> (Anarchore: I'm not sure about these two points, though vdare.com has
> made the case in the US. I have not found proof that it is Zionism and
> not Trudeauite liberalism that is responsible)
> --------------------------------------
> Mass third world immigration
> To conquer a people, they must first be divided or even replaced. To
> achieve this end, people are brought from the poorest countries of the
> world into European and European-founded countries. This increases
> stress for those who have to compete with the new arrivals for jobs and
> housing, and brings up crime levels. The new arrivals may not speak
> English, may have AIDs or other diseases, and are from parts of the
> world where corruption is normal and people disappear for political
> reasons. This is good for Zionofascists. It is much harder to organize
> a resistance to tyrrany when a country is Balkanized into ethnic
> enclaves. Scratch a mass immigration advocate and you may find a
> Zionofascist.
>
> Cultural Marxism/destruction of culture
> Along with mass immigration changing the nature of society, the minds
> of those who are to be replaced must be moulded to accept this and even
> to celebrate it. The history of Europeans or whites is associated with
> colonialism and the misery that our people brought to the world.
> Perversion and hedonism is encouraged by Zionofascist owned media.
> Multiculturalism is pushed as a state value. The 'melting pot' of the
> US has increasing numbers of third world enclaves.
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Blood libel against European people: constant reminders of the Holocaust
> It is as though Jews were the only people who ever suffered throughout
> history. Holocaust memorials are built, and state leaders attend
> ceremonies or make solemn speeches to Jewish groups. The slogan "never
> again" is invoked -but not because the concept of genocide is so
> abhorrent to them- it is to make Jews think that they could be subject
> to renewed persecution at any time, and at the same time shame the
> gentiles into shutting their mouths about Zionofascism. No discussion
> of the Holocaust is permitted, even though much of the story as told
> does not make sense. The Jew Stalin's Russia -where his Bolshevik Jews
> killed far more than even the claimed six million of the Holocaust- is
> never mentioned. More: Sever Plocker on Stalin's Jews World European
> Holocaust Week
>
> Banning of anti-Zionofascist speech such as "Holocaust denial", or
> "hate speech"
> Zionofascist pressure groups like the ADL push for speech banning
> 'hate'. This Stalinist technique of silencing dissent effective in the
> Jewish-run Soviet Union. Today Zionofascists use a variety of methods
> to silence dissent, when they can't enforce outright bans on speech..
>
> The Neocon and Zionist madness is spreading. Media control means that
> most people support at least some of these planks no matter what their
> ideology. It has been so drilled into Canadians' heads that they
> believe it. The more weak-minded the person, the more of these insane
> and destructive markers will be internalized as their belief system. No
> one who has been brainwashed ever realized it as it was happening, but
> the good news is that it can be reversed. All it takes is lifting the
> veil on facts the Zionofascist media refuses to show.
>
> Enter the Internet Resistance.

Scream

<simple_language@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:69cef5fb-b81b-4a75-9267-4d593f82e029@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
source: http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=2150

Ever since World War II, we have been driven by a passionate desire to
understand how mass genocide, terror states and global war came about
– and how we can prevent them in the future.

source: http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=2150

Ever since World War II, we have been driven by a passionate desire to
understand how mass genocide, terror states and global war came about
– and how we can prevent them in the future.

We might eventually wake up to the BS stirrers using their friends and
supporters for their greed and lack of care for others not of their group,
SCREAM


"Benway" <captainoz@mailpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:52d22e45-5a0b-4936-9fb4-7bd175df35df@l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> *
> http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=185
> *
> NO LOBBY IS FEARED MORE or catered to by politicians
> than the Jewish Lobby. If a politician does not play
> ball with the Jewish Lobby, he will not get elected,
> or re-elected, and he will either be smeared or ignored
> by the Jewish-owned major media.

Above all, we have sought answers to several basic questions: Why did
the West fail to see the coming of the catastrophe? Why were there so
few efforts to thwart the fascist tide, and why did virtually all
Western leaders, and so many Western intellectuals, treat the fascists
as if they were normal political leaders, instead of the virulent
revolutionaries they really were? Why did the main designated victims
– the Jews – similarly fail to recognize the magnitude of their
impending doom? Why was resistance so rare?

Most eventually accepted a twofold "explanation": the uniqueness of
the evil, and the lack of historical precedent for it. Italy and
Germany were two of the most civilized and cultured nations in the
world. It was difficult to appreciate that a great evil had become
paramount in the countries that had produced Kant, Beethoven, Dante
and Rossini.

How could Western leaders, let alone the victims, be blamed for
failing to see something that was almost totally new – systematic mass
murder on a vast scale, and a threat to civilization itself? Never
before had there been such an organized campaign to destroy an entire
"race," and it was therefore almost impossible to see it coming, or
even to recognize it as it got under way.

The failure to understand what was happening took a well-known form: a
systematic refusal to view our enemies plain. Hitler's rants, whether
in "Mein Kampf" or at Nazi Party rallies, were often downplayed as
"politics," a way of maintaining popular support. They were rarely
taken seriously as solemn promises he fully intended to fulfill.
Mussolini's call for the creation of a new Italian Empire, and his
later alliance with Hitler, were often downplayed as mere bluster, or
even excused on the grounds that, since other European countries had
overseas territories, why not Italy?

Some scholars broadened the analysis to include other evil regimes,
such as Stalin's Russia, which also systematically murdered millions
of people and whose ambitions similarly threatened the West. Just as
with fascism, most contemporaries found it nearly impossible to
believe that the Gulag Archipelago was what it was. And just as with
fascism, we studied it so that the next time we would see evil early
enough to prevent it from threatening us again.

By now, there is very little we do not know about such regimes, and
such movements. Some of our greatest scholars have described them,
analyzed the reasons for their success, and chronicled the wars we
fought to defeat them. Our understanding is considerable, as is the
honesty and intensity of our desire that such things must be
prevented.

Yet they are with us again, and we are acting as we did in the last
century. The world is simmering in the familiar rhetoric and actions
of movements and regimes – from Hezbollah and al Qaeda to the Iranian
Khomeinists and the Saudi Wahhabis – who swear to destroy us and
others like us. Like their 20th-century predecessors, they openly
proclaim their intentions, and carry them out whenever and wherever
they can. Like our own 20th-century predecessors, we rarely take them
seriously or act accordingly. More often than not, we downplay the
consequences of their words, as if they were some Islamic or Arab
version of "politics," intended for internal consumption, and designed
to accomplish domestic objectives.

Clearly, the explanations we gave for our failure to act in the last
century were wrong. The rise of messianic mass movements is not new,
and there is very little we do not know about them. Nor is there any
excuse for us to be surprised at the success of evil leaders, even in
countries with long histories and great cultural and political
accomplishments. We know all about that. So we need to ask the old
questions again. Why are we failing to see the mounting power of evil
enemies? Why do we treat them as if they were normal political
phenomena, as Western leaders do when they embrace negotiations as the
best course of action?

No doubt there are many reasons. One is the deep-seated belief that
all people are basically the same, and all are basically good. Most
human history, above all the history of the last century, points in
the opposite direction. But it is unpleasant to accept the fact that
many people are evil, and entire cultures, even the finest, can fall
prey to evil leaders and march in lockstep to their commands. Much of
contemporary Western culture is deeply committed to a belief in the
goodness of all mankind; we are reluctant to abandon that reassuring
article of faith. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, we prefer
to pursue the path of reasonableness, even with enemies whose
thoroughly unreasonable fanaticism is manifest.

This is not merely a philosophical issue, for to accept the threat to
us means – short of a policy of national suicide – acting against it.
As it did in the 20th century, it means war. It means that,
temporarily at least, we have to make sacrifices on many fronts: in
the comforts of our lives, indeed in lives lost, in the domestic focus
of our passions – careers derailed and personal freedoms subjected to
unpleasant and even dangerous restrictions – and the diversion of
wealth from self-satisfaction to the instruments of power. All of this
is painful; even the contemplation of it hurts.

Then there is anti-Semitism. Old Jew-hating texts like "The Protocols
of the Elders of Zion," now in Farsi and Arabic, are proliferating
throughout the Middle East. Calls for the destruction of the Jews
appear regularly on Iranian, Egyptian, Saudi and Syrian television and
are heard in European and American mosques. There is little if any
condemnation from the West, and virtually no action against it,
suggesting, at a minimum, a familiar Western indifference to the fate
of the Jews.

Finally, there is the nature of our political system. None of the
democracies adequately prepared for war before it was unleashed on
them in the 1940s. None was prepared for the terror assault of the
21st century. The nature of Western politics makes it very difficult
for national leaders – even those rare men and women who see what is
happening and want to act – to take timely, prudent measures before
war is upon them. Leaders like Winston Churchill are relegated to the
opposition until the battle is unavoidable. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
had to fight desperately to win Congressional approval for a national
military draft a few months before Pearl Harbor.

Then, as now, the initiative lies with the enemies of the West. Even
today, when we are engaged on the battlefields of Iraq and
Afghanistan, there is little apparent recognition that we are under
attack by a familiar sort of enemy, and great reluctance to act
accordingly. This time, ignorance cannot be claimed as an excuse. If
we are defeated, it will be because of failure of will, not lack of
understanding. As, indeed, was almost the case with our near-defeat in
the 1940s.

Anarchore

¯Doug¦Ç wrote:

>Yeah, those less than 20 million Jews worldwide sure to
>get around don't they? It must be their superhuman powers.
>
>I never knew psychotic delusions were contagious.

They certainly are, especially when the rulers subscribe to the power
cult in question. The sickness gets transmitted down into society,
unless you are properly innoculated with the truth.

See Lobaczewskie's study of personality disorders in Communist Poland

http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/polit...obaczewski.htm

May the reader please imagine a very large hall in some old Gothic
university building. Many of us gathered there early in our studies in
order to listen to the lectures of outstanding philosophers. We were
herded back there the year before graduation in order to listen to the
indoctrination lectures which recently have been introduced. Someone
nobody knew appeared behind the lectern and informed us that he would
now be the professor. His speech was fluent, but there was nothing
scientific about it: he failed to distinguish between scientific and
everyday concepts and treated borderline imaginings as though it were
wisdom that could not be doubted. For ninety minutes each week, he
flooded us with naïve, presumptuous paralogistics and a pathological
view of human reality. We were treated with contempt and poorly
controlled hatred. Since fun poking could entail dreadful consequences,
we had to listen attentively and with the utmost gravity.

The grapevine soon discovered this person’s origins. He had come
from a Cracow suburb and attended high school, although no one knew if
he graduated. Anyway, this was the first time he had crossed university
portals - as a professor, at that! […]


>
>"Anarchore" <e@t.me> wrote in message
>news:cZKdnXl9laiUUdfVnZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@posted.unis ervecommunications...
>>The Neocon and Zionist madness is spreading. Media control means
>>that most people support at least some of these planks no matter
>>what their ideology. It has been so drilled into Canadians' heads
>>that they believe it. The more weak-minded the person, the more of
>>these insane and destructive markers will be internalized as their
>>belief system. No one who has been brainwashed ever realized it as
>>it was happening, but the good news is that it can be reversed. All
>>it takes is lifting the veil on facts the Zionofascist media
>>refuses to show.
>>
>>
>>http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/about/
>>
>>
>>What is Zionofascism?
>>
>>What is Zionofascism? by Anarchore
>>
>>Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are necessarily
>>Zionofascists. One does not have to be Jewish to be a Zionofascist.
>>
>>
>>Ahmadinejad is Hitler, the solution is to nuke Iran- Zionofascist
>>radio host Michael Savage
>>
>>Islamofascism Threatens the West so we must Attack Muslims
>>
>>You may be familiar with the compound word 'Islamofascism'. It was
>>coined by the Jewish Neocon talk radio pitbull Michael Savage, to
>>describe a fundamentalist Islamic ideology of conquest. We are all
>>in danger of annihilation by the Islamic hordes, says Michael
>>Savage. Not surprizingly, Mr Savage has recently been calling for
>>nuclear strikes against Iran. President Ahmadinejad is the next
>>Hitler, says Mr Savage.
>>
>>While there may indeed be some people and regimes who could be
>>categorized as Islamofascist, they are not much of a threat to us.
>>Saudi Arabia is ruled by a brutal Islamofascist regime that hosts US
>>airbases and is friendly toward the US, for one example.
>>
>>What Mr Savage and others who have Israel as their first loyalty
>>want to distract us from is that Zionofascism is the prevailing
>>ideology in US and Canadian political/mainstream media discourse.
>>
>>Zionist Occupied Governments(ZOG)
>>
>>
>>The Israel Lobby controls US foreign policy
>>
>>One of Zionofascism's effects is the tendency to put the interests
>>of Israel to the fore even when supporting such interests is
>>damaging to your country's economy, the freedom of it's people, and
>>it's international stature. Bush, Harper, and Blair/Brown are
>>following the Zionofascist Neocon ideology. With the election of
>>Sarkozy, France has now fallen to ZOG as well.
>>
>>The Zionofascist Sarkozy is now President of France
>>
>>We see that Canada is now a full-blown Zionist Occupied Government.
>>Canada has lately been changing it's UN votes in favour of Israel.
>>Canadian troops are fighting Israel's enemies in Afghanistan.
>>Canadian politicians in the Liberal and Conservative parties are
>>openly Zionist.
>>
>>This came to a head in July of 2006, when Israel bombed the
>>civlilian infrastructure of Lebanon. They bombed apartment
>>buildings in Beirut claiming they held Hezbollah missiles, even
>>though Beirut is too far to launch attacks into Israel. They
>>attacked people fleeing their homes, and killed those inside their
>>homes, including a family of 7 Canadians. Harper couldn't wait to
>>excuse Israel's actions, and when they murdered a Canadian UN
>>Peacekeeper Harper was quick to excuse them for that as well. Full
>>story: Canada's Zionist Politicians
>>
>>Civilized countries don't torture. Israel does. Now the US does as
>>well(Actually the US has been torturing people for decades, but now
>>they say it is good to torture if you call it 'pressure' instead).
>>
>>
>>Abu Gharib: The Israelis really know how to keep the Arab
>>troublemakers in line
>>
>>
>>Israeli guard at Abu Gharib Prison
>>
>>Civilized countries don't engage in collective punishment against
>>communities. Israel does, bombing villages and starving the
>>Palestinians. So does the US in Iraq. So -thanks to Zionofascism-
>>does Canada in Afghanistan, calling in air strikes on villages of
>>'Taliban'.
>>
>>Some identifying markers of Zionofascism
>>Each of these planks of the Zionofascist agenda supports and
>>reinforces other aspects of their control
>>
>>Anti-Jewish
>>
>>Zionists, who come from the Jewish faith, have not been the best
>>friends to Jews. Rather, they are willing to sacrifice Jews in
>>order to maintain power. Their power comes from fear -both in
>>Israel where they make sure there is no chance of peace- and
>>where-ever Zionists hold power. Zionists established The State of
>>Israel, which has seen brutal terror against the Palestinians ever
>>since. Yet Judaism says that Israel shall not be a state until the
>>Messiah comes. So "Israel" the state is blasphemous.
>>
>>Media control
>>
>>Fifth Columnists: The NaZionist(National Zionist) Post Publishes
>>False News
>>Shape the news and you shape people's thoughts. The Zionofascist
>>agenda cannot be realized without control of the public mind, and
>>they now control almost all mainstream media.
>>
>>Control/corruption of politicians
>>Powerful Zionofascist lobbying groups like the US AIPAC and the
>>Canadian CJPAC work to change the role of politicians from looking
>>after the best interests of their people to acting in the interests
>>of the terrorist Israeli regime. Together with Zionofascist media
>>control, they make and break politicians in Canada and the US.
>>
>> CJPAC is a unique national, grassroots, independent organization
>>whose mandate is to engage the community in the political process.
>>CJPAC will mobilize the grassroots across the country, build
>>relationships with elected officials - of all political parties -
>>and work for Jewish community interests, on a multi-partisan basis,
>>during and between elections.
>>
>>Unflinching support of The State of Israel
>>Through their control of news media the Zionofascists have a lot of
>>control of the Jewish(and non-Jewish) collective mind. They exploit
>>Jews' feelings of kinship with their people to justify supporting
>>The State of Israel, and hide the brutal actions the Zionist state
>>engages in. Israel's brutality is not shown, but when it cannot be
>>hidden, it's actions are always justified self-defense to protect
>>it from terrorists. Anyone critical of Israel is suspected of
>>anti-semitism.
>>
>>Illogical/psychotic non-sequitors as foreign policy
>>
>>
>>Kootenay Neocon MP Jim Abbott, clown or fool?
>>
>>The lunatics have taken over the asylum. There is no logical
>>justification for Zionofascist foreign policy, so leaders resort to
>>blatant nonsense. Attacking and occupying sovereign countries who
>>never threatened us will make us safer, say our Zionofascist
>>leaders.
>>
>> "You are either with us or you are against us." -George W Bush
>> "Israel's values are Canada's values"- former Liberal Prime
>>Minister Paul Martin
>> "You can fight them in Kandahar or you can fight them in
>>Kamloops" -Kootenay Neocon MP Jim Abbott
>> "A threat on Israel is a threat on Canada" - Neocon Foreign
>>Affairs Minister Peter Mackay
>>
>>The police state triumphs, basic rights and freedoms are curtailed
>>The government attacks centuries of legal precedence. As in Israel,
>>Habeus Corpus is suspended and guilt or innocence is made
>>irrelevant. All it takes is the accusation. Torture is
>>rehabilitated as a tool to preserve freedom that saves lives. Fear
>>of terrorism is the justification. They call it the post-9/11 era.
>>
>>War on Terror
>>The War on Terror is the justification for support of Israel,
>>because Israel is surrounded by Islamofascists who want to destroy
>>it. So say Zionofascists like Michael Savage. As in Israel, terror
>>fears are played up so the racket known as the War on Terror would
>>continue to generate large contracts for companies like Haliburton.
>>State and corporate cohesion was a factor in fascism in Germany and
>>Italy, no different than the Zionofascism of today.
>>
>>State terrorism/false flags/terror hoaxes
>>Israel has been caught numerous times carrying out terror attacks
>>that they attempted to blame on Arabs. The dancing Israeli Mossad
>>agents who were celebrating while videotaping the twin towers
>>burning is one glaring example, showing Israel at least had prior
>>knowledge and was thereby complicit.
>>
>>With Canada's elites drifting towards the Zionist way of thinking,
>>liberties are regarded as threats, individuals are irrelevant and
>>everyone is in danger of political violence from state thugs,
>>possibly only for the reason of having the same name as someone on
>>a no-fly list. As Zionists gains power, the people in affected
>>countries are subjected to false flag terror events or 'near miss'
>>hoaxes designed to spread fear of Arabs.
>>Two recent examples are the June 2006 busts of careless internet
>>chatting Muslim teens in Toronto, and the "liquid bomb plot",
>>laughable cases that were no threat at all. Yet it was all over the
>>news, with media somehow finding out about the Toronto arrests
>>before they happened so they could splash scary photos of police
>>with automatic weapons and scenarios of skinny Muslim teens
>>storming Parliament and decapitating the Prime Minister.
>>
>>The liquid bomb plot where chemicals where supposedly going to be
>>mixed together onboard jetliners was exposed as impossible the
>>moment the story aired, yet that did not stop international air
>>travel from being disrupted and Zionofascists Blair, Harper and
>>Bush to grandstand about the War on Terror..
>>
>>Proxy wars for Israel
>>According to the prevailing view, Saudi hijackers brought down the
>>World Trade Center. Bush set sights on Afghanistan, declaring Bin
>>Laden was the culprit.. He had no evidence, so the Taliban refused
>>to turn him over. The Zionofascist media actively concealed this
>>fact, and so are responsible for distracting from the real
>>perpetrators of 9/11 -Zionofascists. After the criminal US invasion
>>Canada was drawn in, supposedly to help out with reconstruction.
>>Now Canadian troops are fighting the enemies of The State of
>>Israel. Support for proxy wars for Israel such as Afghanistan,
>>Iraq, or Iran is the signature of the uninformed, the stupid, or
>>the Zionofascist.
>>
>>(Anarchore: I'm not sure about these two points, though vdare.com
>>has made the case in the US. I have not found proof that it is
>>Zionism and not Trudeauite liberalism that is responsible)
>>--------------------------------------
>>Mass third world immigration
>>To conquer a people, they must first be divided or even replaced. To
>>achieve this end, people are brought from the poorest countries of
>>the world into European and European-founded countries. This
>>increases stress for those who have to compete with the new
>>arrivals for jobs and housing, and brings up crime levels. The new
>>arrivals may not speak English, may have AIDs or other diseases,
>>and are from parts of the world where corruption is normal and
>>people disappear for political reasons. This is good for
>>Zionofascists. It is much harder to organize a resistance to
>>tyrrany when a country is Balkanized into ethnic enclaves. Scratch
>>a mass immigration advocate and you may find a Zionofascist.
>>
>>Cultural Marxism/destruction of culture
>>Along with mass immigration changing the nature of society, the
>>minds of those who are to be replaced must be moulded to accept
>>this and even to celebrate it. The history of Europeans or whites
>>is associated with colonialism and the misery that our people
>>brought to the world. Perversion and hedonism is encouraged by
>>Zionofascist owned media. Multiculturalism is pushed as a state
>>value. The 'melting pot' of the US has increasing numbers of third
>>world enclaves. ---------------------------------------
>>
>>Blood libel against European people: constant reminders of the
>>Holocaust It is as though Jews were the only people who ever
>>suffered throughout history. Holocaust memorials are built, and
>>state leaders attend ceremonies or make solemn speeches to Jewish
>>groups. The slogan "never again" is invoked -but not because the
>>concept of genocide is so abhorrent to them- it is to make Jews
>>think that they could be subject to renewed persecution at any
>>time, and at the same time shame the gentiles into shutting their
>>mouths about Zionofascism. No discussion of the Holocaust is
>>permitted, even though much of the story as told does not make
>>sense. The Jew Stalin's Russia -where his Bolshevik Jews killed far
>>more than even the claimed six million of the Holocaust- is never
>>mentioned. More: Sever Plocker on Stalin's Jews World European
>>Holocaust Week
>>
>>Banning of anti-Zionofascist speech such as "Holocaust denial", or
>>"hate speech"
>>Zionofascist pressure groups like the ADL push for speech banning
>>'hate'. This Stalinist technique of silencing dissent effective in
>>the Jewish-run Soviet Union. Today Zionofascists use a variety of
>>methods to silence dissent, when they can't enforce outright bans
>>on speech..
>>
>>The Neocon and Zionist madness is spreading. Media control means
>>that most people support at least some of these planks no matter
>>what their ideology. It has been so drilled into Canadians' heads
>>that they believe it. The more weak-minded the person, the more of
>>these insane and destructive markers will be internalized as their
>>belief system. No one who has been brainwashed ever realized it as
>>it was happening, but the good news is that it can be reversed. All
>>it takes is lifting the veil on facts the Zionofascist media
>>refuses to show.
>>
>>Enter the Internet Resistance.

MikeinCamden@aol.com

On 7 Jun, 10:39, "simple_langu...@yahoo.com"
<simple_langu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> source:http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=2150
>
> Ever since World War II, we have been driven by a passionate desire to
> understand how mass genocide, terror states and global war came about
> – and how we can prevent them in the future.
>
> Above all, we have sought answers to several basic questions: Why did
> the West fail to see the coming of the catastrophe? Why were there so
> few efforts to thwart the fascist tide, and why did virtually all
> Western leaders, and so many Western intellectuals, treat the fascists
> as if they were normal political leaders, instead of the virulent
> revolutionaries they really were? Why did the main designated victims
> – the Jews – similarly fail to recognize the magnitude of their
> impending doom? Why was resistance so rare?
>
> Most eventually accepted a twofold "explanation": the uniqueness of
> the evil, and the lack of historical precedent for it. Italy and
> Germany were two of the most civilized and cultured nations in the
> world. It was difficult to appreciate that a great evil had become
> paramount in the countries that had produced Kant, Beethoven, Dante
> and Rossini.
>
> How could Western leaders, let alone the victims, be blamed for
> failing to see something that was almost totally new – systematic mass
> murder on a vast scale, and a threat to civilization itself? Never
> before had there been such an organized campaign to destroy an entire
> "race," and it was therefore almost impossible to see it coming, or
> even to recognize it as it got under way.
>
> The failure to understand what was happening took a well-known form: a
> systematic refusal to view our enemies plain. Hitler's rants, whether
> in "Mein Kampf" or at Nazi Party rallies, were often downplayed as
> "politics," a way of maintaining popular support. They were rarely
> taken seriously as solemn promises he fully intended to fulfill.
> Mussolini's call for the creation of a new Italian Empire, and his
> later alliance with Hitler, were often downplayed as mere bluster, or
> even excused on the grounds that, since other European countries had
> overseas territories, why not Italy?
>
> Some scholars broadened the analysis to include other evil regimes,
> such as Stalin's Russia, which also systematically murdered millions
> of people and whose ambitions similarly threatened the West. Just as
> with fascism, most contemporaries found it nearly impossible to
> believe that the Gulag Archipelago was what it was. And just as with
> fascism, we studied it so that the next time we would see evil early
> enough to prevent it from threatening us again.
>
> By now, there is very little we do not know about such regimes, and
> such movements. Some of our greatest scholars have described them,
> analyzed the reasons for their success, and chronicled the wars we
> fought to defeat them. Our understanding is considerable, as is the
> honesty and intensity of our desire that such things must be
> prevented.
>
> Yet they are with us again, and we are acting as we did in the last
> century. The world is simmering in the familiar rhetoric and actions
> of movements and regimes – from Hezbollah and al Qaeda to the Iranian
> Khomeinists and the Saudi Wahhabis – who swear to destroy us and
> others like us. Like their 20th-century predecessors, they openly
> proclaim their intentions, and carry them out whenever and wherever
> they can. Like our own 20th-century predecessors, we rarely take them
> seriously or act accordingly. More often than not, we downplay the
> consequences of their words, as if they were some Islamic or Arab
> version of "politics," intended for internal consumption, and designed
> to accomplish domestic objectives.
>
> Clearly, the explanations we gave for our failure to act in the last
> century were wrong. The rise of messianic mass movements is not new,
> and there is very little we do not know about them. Nor is there any
> excuse for us to be surprised at the success of evil leaders, even in
> countries with long histories and great cultural and political
> accomplishments. We know all about that. So we need to ask the old
> questions again. Why are we failing to see the mounting power of evil
> enemies? Why do we treat them as if they were normal political
> phenomena, as Western leaders do when they embrace negotiations as the
> best course of action?
>
> No doubt there are many reasons. One is the deep-seated belief that
> all people are basically the same, and all are basically good. Most
> human history, above all the history of the last century, points in
> the opposite direction. But it is unpleasant to accept the fact that
> many people are evil, and entire cultures, even the finest, can fall
> prey to evil leaders and march in lockstep to their commands. Much of
> contemporary Western culture is deeply committed to a belief in the
> goodness of all mankind; we are reluctant to abandon that reassuring
> article of faith. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, we prefer
> to pursue the path of reasonableness, even with enemies whose
> thoroughly unreasonable fanaticism is manifest.
>
> This is not merely a philosophical issue, for to accept the threat to
> us means – short of a policy of national suicide – acting against it.
> As it did in the 20th century, it means war. It means that,
> temporarily at least, we have to make sacrifices on many fronts: in
> the comforts of our lives, indeed in lives lost, in the domestic focus
> of our passions – careers derailed and personal freedoms subjected to
> unpleasant and even dangerous restrictions – and the diversion of
> wealth from self-satisfaction to the instruments of power. All of this
> is painful; even the contemplation of it hurts.
>
> Then there is anti-Semitism. Old Jew-hating texts like "The Protocols
> of the Elders of Zion," now in Farsi and Arabic, are proliferating
> throughout the Middle East. Calls for the destruction of the Jews
> appear regularly on Iranian, Egyptian, Saudi and Syrian television and
> are heard in European and American mosques. There is little if any
> condemnation from the West, and virtually no action against it,
> suggesting, at a minimum, a familiar Western indifference to the fate
> of the Jews.
>
> Finally, there is the nature of our political system. None of the
> democracies adequately prepared for war before it was unleashed on
> them in the 1940s. None was prepared for the terror assault of the
> 21st century. The nature of Western politics makes it very difficult
> for national leaders – even those rare men and women who see what is
> happening and want to act – to take timely, prudent measures before
> war is upon them. Leaders like Winston Churchill are relegated to the
> opposition until the battle is unavoidable. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
> had to fight desperately to win Congressional approval for a national
> military draft a few months before Pearl Harbor.
>
> Then, as now, the initiative lies with the enemies of the West. Even
> today, when we are engaged on the battlefields of Iraq and
> Afghanistan, there is little apparent recognition that we are under
> attack by a familiar sort of enemy, and great reluctance to act
> accordingly. This time, ignorance cannot be claimed as an excuse. If
> we are defeated, it will be because of failure of will, not lack of
> understanding. As, indeed, was almost the case with our near-defeat in
> the 1940s.

Last time people 'did not want any more trouble' with WW1 in mind.
This time our leaders have seen short-term political advantage in
importing our enemies. It is utterly bizarre that people don't want to
see that this is happening or swallow the line about it 'increasing
understanding' and other multi rubbish. It's like saying that if
Britain had imported Nazis or Russian communists in vast numbers they
would given up their ambitions.

Yesterday someone was telling me about a hostel in Camden where the
warden says there are Afghans who were fighting us two years ago.

Years ago I knew a tool shop owner from Hull who was told by the
travelling Bosch rep (a German) in the later 1930s that soon Germany
would invade Britain and he had been promised the role of Gauleiter of
Yorkshire.

Ariadne

On 9 Jun, 08:36, MikeinCam...@aol.com wrote:
> On 7 Jun, 10:39, "simple_langu...@yahoo.com"
>
>
>
> <simple_langu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > source:http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=2150
>
> > Ever since World War II, we have been driven by a passionate desire to
> > understand how mass genocide, terror states and global war came about
> > – and how we can prevent them in the future.
>
> > Above all, we have sought answers to several basic questions: Why did
> > the West fail to see the coming of the catastrophe? Why were there so
> > few efforts to thwart the fascist tide, and why did virtually all
> > Western leaders, and so many Western intellectuals, treat the fascists
> > as if they were normal political leaders, instead of the virulent
> > revolutionaries they really were? Why did the main designated victims
> > – the Jews – similarly fail to recognize the magnitude of their
> > impending doom? Why was resistance so rare?
>
> > Most eventually accepted a twofold "explanation": the uniqueness of
> > the evil, and the lack of historical precedent for it. Italy and
> > Germany were two of the most civilized and cultured nations in the
> > world. It was difficult to appreciate that a great evil had become
> > paramount in the countries that had produced Kant, Beethoven, Dante
> > and Rossini.
>
> > How could Western leaders, let alone the victims, be blamed for
> > failing to see something that was almost totally new – systematic mass
> > murder on a vast scale, and a threat to civilization itself? Never
> > before had there been such an organized campaign to destroy an entire
> > "race," and it was therefore almost impossible to see it coming, or
> > even to recognize it as it got under way.
>
> > The failure to understand what was happening took a well-known form: a
> > systematic refusal to view our enemies plain. Hitler's rants, whether
> > in "Mein Kampf" or at Nazi Party rallies, were often downplayed as
> > "politics," a way of maintaining popular support. They were rarely
> > taken seriously as solemn promises he fully intended to fulfill.
> > Mussolini's call for the creation of a new Italian Empire, and his
> > later alliance with Hitler, were often downplayed as mere bluster, or
> > even excused on the grounds that, since other European countries had
> > overseas territories, why not Italy?
>
> > Some scholars broadened the analysis to include other evil regimes,
> > such as Stalin's Russia, which also systematically murdered millions
> > of people and whose ambitions similarly threatened the West. Just as
> > with fascism, most contemporaries found it nearly impossible to
> > believe that the Gulag Archipelago was what it was. And just as with
> > fascism, we studied it so that the next time we would see evil early
> > enough to prevent it from threatening us again.
>
> > By now, there is very little we do not know about such regimes, and
> > such movements. Some of our greatest scholars have described them,
> > analyzed the reasons for their success, and chronicled the wars we
> > fought to defeat them. Our understanding is considerable, as is the
> > honesty and intensity of our desire that such things must be
> > prevented.
>
> > Yet they are with us again, and we are acting as we did in the last
> > century. The world is simmering in the familiar rhetoric and actions
> > of movements and regimes – from Hezbollah and al Qaeda to the Iranian
> > Khomeinists and the Saudi Wahhabis – who swear to destroy us and
> > others like us. Like their 20th-century predecessors, they openly
> > proclaim their intentions, and carry them out whenever and wherever
> > they can. Like our own 20th-century predecessors, we rarely take them
> > seriously or act accordingly. More often than not, we downplay the
> > consequences of their words, as if they were some Islamic or Arab
> > version of "politics," intended for internal consumption, and designed
> > to accomplish domestic objectives.
>
> > Clearly, the explanations we gave for our failure to act in the last
> > century were wrong. The rise of messianic mass movements is not new,
> > and there is very little we do not know about them. Nor is there any
> > excuse for us to be surprised at the success of evil leaders, even in
> > countries with long histories and great cultural and political
> > accomplishments. We know all about that. So we need to ask the old
> > questions again. Why are we failing to see the mounting power of evil
> > enemies? Why do we treat them as if they were normal political
> > phenomena, as Western leaders do when they embrace negotiations as the
> > best course of action?
>
> > No doubt there are many reasons. One is the deep-seated belief that
> > all people are basically the same, and all are basically good. Most
> > human history, above all the history of the last century, points in
> > the opposite direction. But it is unpleasant to accept the fact that
> > many people are evil, and entire cultures, even the finest, can fall
> > prey to evil leaders and march in lockstep to their commands. Much of
> > contemporary Western culture is deeply committed to a belief in the
> > goodness of all mankind; we are reluctant to abandon that reassuring
> > article of faith. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, we prefer
> > to pursue the path of reasonableness, even with enemies whose
> > thoroughly unreasonable fanaticism is manifest.
>
> > This is not merely a philosophical issue, for to accept the threat to
> > us means – short of a policy of national suicide – acting against it..
> > As it did in the 20th century, it means war. It means that,
> > temporarily at least, we have to make sacrifices on many fronts: in
> > the comforts of our lives, indeed in lives lost, in the domestic focus
> > of our passions – careers derailed and personal freedoms subjected to
> > unpleasant and even dangerous restrictions – and the diversion of
> > wealth from self-satisfaction to the instruments of power. All of this
> > is painful; even the contemplation of it hurts.
>
> > Then there is anti-Semitism. Old Jew-hating texts like "The Protocols
> > of the Elders of Zion," now in Farsi and Arabic, are proliferating
> > throughout the Middle East. Calls for the destruction of the Jews
> > appear regularly on Iranian, Egyptian, Saudi and Syrian television and
> > are heard in European and American mosques. There is little if any
> > condemnation from the West, and virtually no action against it,
> > suggesting, at a minimum, a familiar Western indifference to the fate
> > of the Jews.
>
> > Finally, there is the nature of our political system. None of the
> > democracies adequately prepared for war before it was unleashed on
> > them in the 1940s. None was prepared for the terror assault of the
> > 21st century. The nature of Western politics makes it very difficult
> > for national leaders – even those rare men and women who see what is
> > happening and want to act – to take timely, prudent measures before
> > war is upon them. Leaders like Winston Churchill are relegated to the
> > opposition until the battle is unavoidable. Franklin Delano Roosevelt
> > had to fight desperately to win Congressional approval for a national
> > military draft a few months before Pearl Harbor.
>
> > Then, as now, the initiative lies with the enemies of the West. Even
> > today, when we are engaged on the battlefields of Iraq and
> > Afghanistan, t