jimj122680@yahoo.com

Great article.

Here is something I wrote a while back:


THE ORIGINS OF MODERN POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND WHY IT WAS CREATED
Back in the early 1960's, the radical left set out to destroy the
West, especially the United States. Obviously they had no military
means to accomplish such a task. Instead they set out to destroy the
West though "demographic warfare" - replacing whites with non-whites
via massive 3rd world immigration from countries with cultures vastly
different from those in the West. The radical left knew whites would
complain and even revolt over this onslaught from the 3rd world. To
temper such predictible white revolt, the left created the "political
correctness" doctrine. The purpose of political correctness is
twofold:
1 - Prevent whites from complaining by intimidating them through shame
and guilt (ie. "white guilt"). The left would embark on a campaign
which constantly reminds whites of their past injustices (e.g.
slavery, Native Americans, etc). For defiant whites who still
complained about non-white immigrants, the left would browbeat them
with name calling such as, "racist", "bigot", and even "Nazi". Such
name calling would effectively humiliate most defiant whites into
silence. It would also act as a warning to whites in general as to
what they can expect if they dare critisize non-white immigrants
(legal or illegal).
2 - The other end of political correctness deals with propaganda and
indoctrination. Whites are told that masses of non-white immigrants
are actually a good thing. As the media tells us, non-white non-
Western immigrants "enhance the human experience in the United
States", and, "bring new ideas to our American culture". This is the
docrtine of "multiculturalism" and we are lectured repeatedly on how
glorious it is. U.S. cities which are multicultural are touted as
"cosmopolitan" and "sophisticated" whereas cities which are primarly
white are portrayed as "backwards". As with any well orchestrated
propaganda campaign, multiculturalism has its own lexicon. Terms such
as "celebrate diversity", "tolerance", "embrace our differences" are
designed not only to reduce white resistance to multiculturalism but
to flip white thinking entirely ie. towards embracing
muliculturalism. Essentially then, such leftist propaganda is a
method to trick whites into embracing the very thing (ie.
multiculturalism) which will obviously lead to their demise in the
West.
In summary, political correctness is a leftist scheme intended to
counter whites who object to massive non-white immigration (legal or
illegal). Whites are falsely conditioned to believe that
multiculturalism is a good thing and those whites who object are
shamed into silence.

###

klunk

<jimj122680@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d815d2e7-0738-45f5-b29b-8427ad6ecb91@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> Great article.
>
> Here is something I wrote a while back:
>
>
> THE ORIGINS OF MODERN POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND WHY IT WAS CREATED
> Back in the early 1960's, the radical left set out to destroy the
> West, especially the United States. Obviously they had no military
> means to accomplish such a task. Instead they set out to destroy the
> West though "demographic warfare" - replacing whites with non-whites
> via massive 3rd world immigration from countries with cultures vastly
> different from those in the West. The radical left knew whites would
> complain and even revolt over this onslaught from the 3rd world. To
> temper such predictible white revolt, the left created the "political
> correctness" doctrine. The purpose of political correctness is
> twofold:
> 1 - Prevent whites from complaining by intimidating them through shame
> and guilt (ie. "white guilt"). The left would embark on a campaign
> which constantly reminds whites of their past injustices (e.g.
> slavery, Native Americans, etc). For defiant whites who still
> complained about non-white immigrants, the left would browbeat them
> with name calling such as, "racist", "bigot", and even "Nazi". Such
> name calling would effectively humiliate most defiant whites into
> silence. It would also act as a warning to whites in general as to
> what they can expect if they dare critisize non-white immigrants
> (legal or illegal).
> 2 - The other end of political correctness deals with propaganda and
> indoctrination. Whites are told that masses of non-white immigrants
> are actually a good thing. As the media tells us, non-white non-
> Western immigrants "enhance the human experience in the United
> States", and, "bring new ideas to our American culture". This is the
> docrtine of "multiculturalism" and we are lectured repeatedly on how
> glorious it is. U.S. cities which are multicultural are touted as
> "cosmopolitan" and "sophisticated" whereas cities which are primarly
> white are portrayed as "backwards". As with any well orchestrated
> propaganda campaign, multiculturalism has its own lexicon. Terms such
> as "celebrate diversity", "tolerance", "embrace our differences" are
> designed not only to reduce white resistance to multiculturalism but
> to flip white thinking entirely ie. towards embracing
> muliculturalism. Essentially then, such leftist propaganda is a
> method to trick whites into embracing the very thing (ie.
> multiculturalism) which will obviously lead to their demise in the
> West.
> In summary, political correctness is a leftist scheme intended to
> counter whites who object to massive non-white immigration (legal or
> illegal). Whites are falsely conditioned to believe that
> multiculturalism is a good thing and those whites who object are
> shamed into silence.
>

hmmmm.... and why would you think multiculturalism it is "false" to believe
it is a good thing...?... do you think all races and cultures should simply
erect walls to segregate each into their own incestuous caves whilst denying
themselves the benefit of learning about differences that help one to grow
as individual human beings...?...

Stan Pierce

<jimj122680@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d815d2e7-0738-45f5-b29b-8427ad6ecb91@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> Great article.
>
> Here is something I wrote a while back:
>
>
> THE ORIGINS OF MODERN POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND WHY IT WAS CREATED
> Back in the early 1960's, the radical left set out to destroy the
> West, especially the United States. Obviously they had no military
> means to accomplish such a task. Instead they set out to destroy the
> West though "demographic warfare" - replacing whites with non-whites
> via massive 3rd world immigration from countries with cultures vastly
> different from those in the West. The radical left knew whites would
> complain and even revolt over this onslaught from the 3rd world. To
> temper such predictible white revolt, the left created the "political
> correctness" doctrine. The purpose of political correctness is
> twofold:
> 1 - Prevent whites from complaining by intimidating them through shame
> and guilt (ie. "white guilt"). The left would embark on a campaign
> which constantly reminds whites of their past injustices (e.g.
> slavery, Native Americans, etc). For defiant whites who still
> complained about non-white immigrants, the left would browbeat them
> with name calling such as, "racist", "bigot", and even "Nazi". Such
> name calling would effectively humiliate most defiant whites into
> silence. It would also act as a warning to whites in general as to
> what they can expect if they dare critisize non-white immigrants
> (legal or illegal).
> 2 - The other end of political correctness deals with propaganda and
> indoctrination. Whites are told that masses of non-white immigrants
> are actually a good thing. As the media tells us, non-white non-
> Western immigrants "enhance the human experience in the United
> States", and, "bring new ideas to our American culture". This is the
> docrtine of "multiculturalism" and we are lectured repeatedly on how
> glorious it is. U.S. cities which are multicultural are touted as
> "cosmopolitan" and "sophisticated" whereas cities which are primarly
> white are portrayed as "backwards". As with any well orchestrated
> propaganda campaign, multiculturalism has its own lexicon. Terms such
> as "celebrate diversity", "tolerance", "embrace our differences" are
> designed not only to reduce white resistance to multiculturalism but
> to flip white thinking entirely ie. towards embracing
> muliculturalism. Essentially then, such leftist propaganda is a
> method to trick whites into embracing the very thing (ie.
> multiculturalism) which will obviously lead to their demise in the
> West.
> In summary, political correctness is a leftist scheme intended to
> counter whites who object to massive non-white immigration (legal or
> illegal). Whites are falsely conditioned to believe that
> multiculturalism is a good thing and those whites who object are
> shamed into silence.
>
> ###

True. You got the strategy right. You should also have mentioned the
influence of the people involved who actually carried it out...the
professors who were engaged in the de-Nazification program in Germany from
1945 to 1948.
All members of the Frankfurt School. Look up who the members were...they
will be familiar to those educated in the 1950s and 60s, like me.

They wrote the books that swamped British and American universities for
their 'social studies' programs.

jimj122680@yahoo.com

> hmmmm.... and why would you think multiculturalism it is "false" to believe
> it is a good thing...?... do you think all races and cultures should simply
> erect walls to segregate each into their own incestuous caves whilst denying
> themselves the benefit of learning about differences that help one to grow
> as individual human beings...?...

You're being a silly and naive idealist. You sound very very young.
You can believe multiculturalism is a good thing, but your standard
for "good" is odd. Six thousand years of recorded history shows that
endless numbers of wars, bloody revolts, uprisings, separatists
movements, etc. are rooted in ethnic/racial/cultural/religious
clashes. 6,000 years of history should prove to you that the answer
for humanity probably lies with embracing homogenous societies.
The bottom line is this.... creating multicultural societies is, in
the worst case, laying the seeds for future bloody conflict and, in
the best case, it results in a society filled with tension, social
conflict, multipronged castes all competing in antagonistic ways, envy
of one tribe vs another, etc. You can drop another tab of LSD and get
into your utopian "one world" vibe but it is just that, utopian.
Multiculturalists are engineering disaster, history proves that.

Probably the most advanced society/nation on Earth, Japan, is
extremely homogenous.

One can learn about various cultures and exchange ideas with them
without creating multicultural societies, it's called travel. Futher,
the Internet helps to facilitate exchanging ideas in immeasurable
ways.

jimj122680@yahoo.com

On Aug 24, 6:26 pm, "Stan Pierce" <ecre...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> <jimj122...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d815d2e7-0738-45f5-b29b-8427ad6ecb91@s1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Great article.
>
> > Here is something I wrote a while back:
>
> > THE ORIGINS OF MODERN POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND WHY IT WAS CREATED
> > Back in the early 1960's, the radical left set out to destroy the
> > West, especially the United States. Obviously they had no military
> > means to accomplish such a task. Instead they set out to destroy the
> > West though "demographic warfare" - replacing whites with non-whites
> > via massive 3rd world immigration from countries with cultures vastly
> > different from those in the West. The radical left knew whites would
> > complain and even revolt over this onslaught from the 3rd world. To
> > temper such predictible white revolt, the left created the "political
> > correctness" doctrine. The purpose of political correctness is
> > twofold:
> > 1 - Prevent whites from complaining by intimidating them through shame
> > and guilt (ie. "white guilt"). The left would embark on a campaign
> > which constantly reminds whites of their past injustices (e.g.
> > slavery, Native Americans, etc). For defiant whites who still
> > complained about non-white immigrants, the left would browbeat them
> > with name calling such as, "racist", "bigot", and even "Nazi". Such
> > name calling would effectively humiliate most defiant whites into
> > silence. It would also act as a warning to whites in general as to
> > what they can expect if they dare critisize non-white immigrants
> > (legal or illegal).
> > 2 - The other end of political correctness deals with propaganda and
> > indoctrination. Whites are told that masses of non-white immigrants
> > are actually a good thing. As the media tells us, non-white non-
> > Western immigrants "enhance the human experience in the United
> > States", and, "bring new ideas to our American culture". This is the
> > docrtine of "multiculturalism" and we are lectured repeatedly on how
> > glorious it is. U.S. cities which are multicultural are touted as
> > "cosmopolitan" and "sophisticated" whereas cities which are primarly
> > white are portrayed as "backwards". As with any well orchestrated
> > propaganda campaign, multiculturalism has its own lexicon. Terms such
> > as "celebrate diversity", "tolerance", "embrace our differences" are
> > designed not only to reduce white resistance to multiculturalism but
> > to flip white thinking entirely ie. towards embracing
> > muliculturalism. Essentially then, such leftist propaganda is a
> > method to trick whites into embracing the very thing (ie.
> > multiculturalism) which will obviously lead to their demise in the
> > West.
> > In summary, political correctness is a leftist scheme intended to
> > counter whites who object to massive non-white immigration (legal or
> > illegal). Whites are falsely conditioned to believe that
> > multiculturalism is a good thing and those whites who object are
> > shamed into silence.
>
> > ###
>
> True. You got the strategy right. You should also have mentioned the
> influence of the people involved who actually carried it out...the
> professors who were engaged in the de-Nazification program in Germany from
> 1945 to 1948.
> All members of the Frankfurt School. Look up who the members were...they
> will be familiar to those educated in the 1950s and 60s, like me.
>
> They wrote the books that swamped British and American universities for
> their 'social studies' programs.

Thanks for your comments. I added the modifier "Modern" to "Political
Correctness" in my title to distinguish the period beginning in the
60's from the earlier period of Political Correctness, ie. that of the
Frankfurt School.

klunk

<jimj122680@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1c21c4fe-cead-46b2-8277-34a78e29a0a0@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>> hmmmm.... and why would you think multiculturalism it is "false" to
>> believe
>> it is a good thing...?... do you think all races and cultures should
>> simply
>> erect walls to segregate each into their own incestuous caves whilst
>> denying
>> themselves the benefit of learning about differences that help one to
>> grow
>> as individual human beings...?...
>
> You're being a silly and naive idealist. You sound very very young.
> You can believe multiculturalism is a good thing, but your standard
> for "good" is odd. Six thousand years of recorded history shows that
> endless numbers of wars, bloody revolts, uprisings, separatists
> movements, etc. are rooted in ethnic/racial/cultural/religious
> clashes. 6,000 years of history should prove to you that the answer
> for humanity probably lies with embracing homogenous societies.
> The bottom line is this.... creating multicultural societies is, in
> the worst case, laying the seeds for future bloody conflict and, in
> the best case, it results in a society filled with tension, social
> conflict, multipronged castes all competing in antagonistic ways, envy
> of one tribe vs another, etc. You can drop another tab of LSD and get
> into your utopian "one world" vibe but it is just that, utopian.
> Multiculturalists are engineering disaster, history proves that.
>
> Probably the most advanced society/nation on Earth, Japan, is
> extremely homogenous.
>
> One can learn about various cultures and exchange ideas with them
> without creating multicultural societies, it's called travel. Futher,
> the Internet helps to facilitate exchanging ideas in immeasurable
> ways.

funny how you would assume everyone becomes as bitterly delusioned as you
obviously have become with age... i never once intimated that our world's
history is not rife with conflict and bloodshed for what amounts to nothing
more than irrelevant differences between people... but, to contrast your
very bitter and despair-filled example of homogoneity as an example of what
you think indicates a successful society... you fail to acknowledge two very
salient points.... 1. japan has the highest suicide rate in the world... and
2. canada has been a beacon of peaceful co-existence between cultures that
have been warring for centuries... and is therefore irrefutable proof that
multi-culturalism works... and if you could actually learn to take pride in
the remarkable accomplishment that is this great nation which serves as a
beacon of hope to the rest of this world, then you may learn to realize that
it's attitudes like yours that denigrates and destroys the accomplishments
earned by our forefathers with their own shedding of blood... in short...
the only problem with multi-culturalism are the bigotries which assholes
like you inflict upon it... (assuming of course that you are canadian...
and if not, then i would thank you for not polluting our newsgroup any
further with your bile and simply say it's no wonder your own home country
hasn't been able to develop the same level of social stability we have come
to appreciate here)...

jimj122680@yahoo.com

> 1. japan has the highest suicide rate in the world... and

Yawn... the standard leftist response. Lefties can't stand the fact
that Japan is perhaps the most advanced society on Earth and yet it's
99.9% homogenous - so liberals have to bash Japan by saying that it
"has the highest suicide rate in the world". Yeah, well it also has
the lowest crime rate in the world. Deal with it. Homogeneous
nations WORK.

> 2. canada has been a beacon of peaceful co-existence between cultures that
> have been warring for centuries... and is therefore irrefutable proof that
> multi-culturalism works...

[laughing] Which is why Canada has over 2,500 anti-racist, anti-
discrimination, etc human rights groups fighting the natural tensions
which result in any multicultural society. My friend,
multiculturalism is unnatural, it doesn't work. It might be nice if
it did work, but it doesn't. Canada was infinitely more harmonious of
a nation when it was essentially a homogenous society (say, before
1965). So....... you had a great, peaceful nation with no tension and
what did your globalist-run masters do? They had to **** it up.


> the only problem with multi-culturalism are the bigotries which assholes like you inflict upon it

Everyone (including you) is a bigot and/or racist to one degree or
another. It's human nature. You're problem is you think somehow
these characteristics of humans can be erased. They can't. And they
they never will be.

B J Foster

jimj122680@yahoo.com wrote:
>> 1. japan has the highest suicide rate in the world... and
>
> Yawn... the standard leftist response. Lefties can't stand the fact
> that Japan is perhaps the most advanced society on Earth and yet it's
> 99.9% homogenous - so liberals have to bash Japan by saying that it
> "has the highest suicide rate in the world". Yeah, well it also has
> the lowest crime rate in the world. Deal with it. Homogeneous
> nations WORK.

Switzerland, Canada and Australia all heterogenous, all have similar low
crime rates - and do some research into how crimes are reported before
jumping to too many conclusions.


>
>> 2. canada has been a beacon of peaceful co-existence between cultures that
>> have been warring for centuries... and is therefore irrefutable proof that
>> multi-culturalism works...
>
> [laughing] Which is why Canada has over 2,500 anti-racist, anti-
> discrimination, etc human rights groups fighting the natural tensions
> which result in any multicultural society. My friend,
> multiculturalism is unnatural, it doesn't work. It might be nice if
> it did work, but it doesn't. Canada was infinitely more harmonious of
> a nation when it was essentially a homogenous society (say, before
> 1965). So....... you had a great, peaceful nation with no tension and
> what did your globalist-run masters do? They had to **** it up.

Quebec didn't exist before 1965?


>
>
>> the only problem with multi-culturalism are the bigotries which assholes like you inflict upon it
>
> Everyone (including you) is a bigot and/or racist to one degree or
> another. It's human nature. You're problem is you think somehow
> these characteristics of humans can be erased. They can't. And they
> they never will be.

Problem identification is always the first step

klunk

<jimj122680@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:909606be-d3ac-460b-9753-4a679dea5820@s20g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> 1. japan has the highest suicide rate in the world... and
>
> Yawn... the standard leftist response. Lefties can't stand the fact
> that Japan is perhaps the most advanced society on Earth and yet it's
> 99.9% homogenous - so liberals have to bash Japan by saying that it
> "has the highest suicide rate in the world". Yeah, well it also has
> the lowest crime rate in the world. Deal with it. Homogeneous
> nations WORK.

lol... i'm sure the families of those committing suicide are grateful for
their success rate in dealing with the successes of a nation that subsumes
individuality... how interesting that you seem to prefer a non-existence
yourself... are you jealous because you've not developed enough courage to
take your own life...?...



>> 2. canada has been a beacon of peaceful co-existence between cultures
>> that
>> have been warring for centuries... and is therefore irrefutable proof
>> that
>> multi-culturalism works...
>
> [laughing] Which is why Canada has over 2,500 anti-racist, anti-
> discrimination, etc human rights groups fighting the natural tensions
> which result in any multicultural society. My friend,
> multiculturalism is unnatural, it doesn't work. It might be nice if
> it did work, but it doesn't. Canada was infinitely more harmonious of
> a nation when it was essentially a homogenous society (say, before
> 1965). So....... you had a great, peaceful nation with no tension and
> what did your globalist-run masters do? They had to **** it up.
>

lol... yup... there's still a lot of hate-filled little ****s like you that
need rules to let you know what your boundaries are... ;-)


>> the only problem with multi-culturalism are the bigotries which assholes
>> like you inflict upon it
>
> Everyone (including you) is a bigot and/or racist to one degree or
> another. It's human nature. You're problem is you think somehow
> these characteristics of humans can be erased. They can't. And they
> they never will be.

lol... that's exactly the sort of justification a criminal uses to justify
their own crimes... everyone else does it too.... bwahahahahaha.... how
truly pathetic...