Re: Excellent article on PC

24th August 2008, 11:33 PM

> there's a HUGE difference between being sensitive to the implications of and
> impact one's words has on another and being afraid.... if you find yourself
> being afraid of speaking, then that could only happen because you know that
> your views are offensive to begin with.... ;-)
>
I like to leave to the authorities to decide what I can or cannot say.

25th August 2008, 04:07 AM

On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:47

8 -0700 (PDT), MikeinCamden@aol.com wrote:

>
>> there's a HUGE difference between being sensitive to the implications of and
>> impact one's words has on another and being afraid.... if you find yourself
>> being afraid of speaking, then that could only happen because you know that
>> your views are offensive to begin with.... ;-)
>>
>I like to leave to the authorities to decide what I can or cannot say.

I hope you're just being facetious.

25th August 2008, 04:48 AM

On 24 Aug, 09:46, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:47

8 -0700 (PDT), MikeinCam...@aol.com wrote:
>
> >> there's a HUGE difference between being sensitive to the implications of and
> >> impact one's words has on another and being afraid.... if you find yourself
> >> being afraid of speaking, then that could only happen because you know that
> >> your views are offensive to begin with.... ;-)
>
> >I like to leave to the authorities to decide what I can or cannot say.
>
> I hope you're just being facetious.

Best to be on the safe side. The Sun editorial tells me the correct
way to think.

25th August 2008, 09:53 AM

MikeinCamden@aol.com wrote:
> On 24 Aug, 09:46, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:47

8 -0700 (PDT), MikeinCam...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>>> there's a HUGE difference between being sensitive to the
>>>> implications of and impact one's words has on another and being
>>>> afraid.... if you find yourself being afraid of speaking, then
>>>> that could only happen because you know that your views are
>>>> offensive to begin with.... ;-)
>>
>>> I like to leave to the authorities to decide what I can or cannot
>>> say.
>>
>> I hope you're just being facetious.
>
> Best to be on the safe side. The Sun editorial tells me the correct
> way to think.

Dont believe it, the real truth can only be found in the Daily Mail.
Remember, Murdoch is a republican. Don't trust him.

25th August 2008, 10:55 AM

On 24 Aug, 15

8, "Lou Ravi" <j.mur...@libertysurf.fr> wrote:
> MikeinCam...@aol.com wrote:
> > On 24 Aug, 09:46, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:47

8 -0700 (PDT), MikeinCam...@aol.com wrote:
>
> >>>> there's a HUGE difference between being sensitive to the
> >>>> implications of and impact one's words has on another and being
> >>>> afraid.... if you find yourself being afraid of speaking, then
> >>>> that could only happen because you know that your views are
> >>>> offensive to begin with.... ;-)
>
> >>> I like to leave to the authorities to decide what I can or cannot
> >>> say.
>
> >> I hope you're just being facetious.
>
> > Best to be on the safe side. The Sun editorial tells me the correct
> > way to think.
>
> Dont believe it, the real truth can only be found in the Daily Mail.
> Remember, Murdoch is a republican. Don't trust him.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Heresy. 12 million Sun readers know the correct path to avoid arrest.