forevernitefan

On Aug 27, 3:20*am, "Robert D." <Robert...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
>
> news:6hjv0tFmdanaU2@mid.individual.net...
>
> >> *h.. One mail is enough
> >> *We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within 24
> >> hours, but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us
> >> several mails about the same "case", you will not speed things up but
> >> just give us more work.
>
> > ROTFLMAO! ... let us know how that works out for you, you pathetic
> > imbecile.
>
> Why don't you just be a little more civil?

He can't. Sadly that's the way Eric Ross is. It's also why he's using
both prof. Jonez and reality check as his nyms. He hides behing a
proxy because he knows if his abuses are traced directly to where he
cowers, someone might bust a few of his bones.

He abuses online because his life sucks and he's in reality a coward.

>
> Maybe it's because you just don't have the ability to debate like a normal
> person.

True, he doesn't. Also one of many possibilities is that he has poor
interpersonal skills and this is a way for him to vent his anger. He's
been doing this crap for years harassing on usenet under multiple
nyms. His abuses are moronic and repetitive and his local poilce
actually visited him for a talk about his online activity after some
of his more virulent threats were posted under yet another nym. He
denies the plice ever visited him but a few days ago made the mstake
of saying they took notes during their talk with him, a fact that was
not mentioned before by the complantant.

>
> Normal people can disagree without calling people names or making threats..
> You aparently are not a normal person.

(( SIGH)) Put on youe hip waders. He loves feces.
>
> Prove me wrong.



Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/

_ Prof. Jonez _

forevernitefan wrote:
> On Aug 27, 3:20 am, "Robert D." <Robert...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
>>
>>
>>>> h.. One mail is enough
>>>> We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within 24
>>>> hours, but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us
>>>> several mails about the same "case", you will not speed things up
>>>> but just give us more work.
>>
>>> ROTFLMAO! ... let us know how that works out for you, you pathetic
>>> imbecile.
>>
>> Why don't you just be a little more civil?
>
> He can't. Sadly that's the way Eric Ross is.

Who's "Eric Ross" ?

> It's also why he's using
> both prof. Jonez and reality check as his nyms. He hides behing a
> proxy because he knows if his abuses are traced directly to where he
> cowers, someone might bust a few of his bones.

Who's "someone", eh coward.

And you again confess Kent's and Your lies about "tracing posts" back to me.

Robert D.

5.5
Someone posted articles that do not adhere to your rules. What do I do?
That depends on the type of offense:


a.. Violation of a newsgroup's charter
Please inform the author about the usual conventions via e-mail first -
especially if there are particular features in addition or contrary to the
usual rules in de.*. If this does not work, simply add that author to the
kill file / the filter of your news reader.

b.. Problems with the content of postings
Please clarify your differences with the author directly or use the kill
file / filter of your news reader. In serious cases you can consider legal
procedures, of course.

c.. Substantial abuse (SPAM, rogue cancel)
Please turn to abuse@individual.net in such cases, attaching at least one
complete article header if possible.
What should an abuse report look like so that it can be dealt with most
efficiently?


d.. Choose or adjust the subject of your mail with care
Put something like "Complaint" or "SPAM:" at the _beginning_ of your
subject line if you keep the original subject of the posting. Otherwise we
might mistake your mail for SPAM and delete it unread.

e.. Mail your abuse report to "abuse@individual.net"
Do NOT mail it to "postmaster" or "webmaster". These services (mail and
www) are taken care of by other people so that your abuse report will need
to be forwarded to us.

f.. Tell us the reason for your complaint
It may be obvious for you, but sometimes it is hard for us to quickly
identify the reason for your complaint if you only send us the article in
question. It helps us a lot if you state briefly what you are complaining
about.

g.. Include the Message-ID
To be able to react quickly we need the Message-ID or (even better) the
entire header of the posting in question. You normally do not need to quote
the body of the article.

h.. One mail is enough
We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within 24 hours,
but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us several mails about
the same "case", you will not speed things up but just give us more work.

forevernitefan

On Aug 27, 11:54*am, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> forevernitefan wrote:
> > On Aug 27, 3:20 am, "Robert D." <Robert...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
>
> >>>> h.. One mail is enough
> >>>> We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within 24
> >>>> hours, but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us
> >>>> several mails about the same "case", you will not speed things up
> >>>> but just give us more work.
>
> >>> ROTFLMAO! ... let us know how that works out for you, you pathetic
> >>> imbecile.
>
> >> Why don't you just be a little more civil?
>
> > *He can't. Sadly that's the way Eric Ross is.
>
> Who's "Eric Ross" ?

You. Having idenity problems agian?

>
> > It's also why he's using
> > both prof. Jonez and reality check as his nyms. *He hides behing a
> > proxy because he knows if his abuses are traced directly to where he
> > cowers, someone might bust a few of his bones.
>
> Who's "someone", eh coward.

Any person who might have had enoughof you to track you down for a
physical meeting. Jonesie. As for me being a coward, how ironic since
you are a coward yourself. I'll send you my physical address so you
can meet ME face to face when you email me with a valid email and IP
account. I'm quite willing to see how you really are when you are
physically with the person you verbally abuse so hungilly online.

So email, me or p rove yoruself the real coward here.
>
> And you again confess Kent's and Your lies about "tracing posts" back to me.


You call them lies, but you know very well they were in fact traced
back to you. At the time of the racist attacks you were living in
Boulder, Colorado, and the posts were traced to that city. According
to Kent , there are only three people on usenet who obsess about him
so much that they would take advantage of his vacation period out of
the country to spew racist death threats against him and his family.
You thought by the time he returned the racist posts you made would no
longer be traceable to the city where you live, You were wrong. I kept
you under your racist act busy posting, obtaining more than enough
examples for someone who knows how to trace repeatedly back to the
source-- you. And you recently made the mistake of saying the police
that visitied you took notes while they talked with you-- a detail
that was not revealed before. Which, BTW contradicted your claim that
the local police never paid your a visit over this matter. You proved
yourself to be a liar.

You can deny all you want, call us liars and ****s until your
trollish fingers bleed, and ryto deride me with shit-eating references
all you want. In the end you show more of what you are than anything I
nor Kent can say. And G-d knows what you try to hide. I wouldn't want
to be you when that time comes, Eric.

******* BRAAAWWWKKK!! Jonesie wants a crappper!!
BWRAAAWWWWKKK!! Jonesie wants a crapper!!*********
---- Norwegian Blue Parrot.

Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
http://www.boblarsonfanclub.tk/


- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Kent Wills

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:37:18 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
<fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Aug 27, 3:20*am, "Robert D." <Robert...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
>>
>> news:6hjv0tFmdanaU2@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> >> *h.. One mail is enough
>> >> *We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within 24
>> >> hours, but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us
>> >> several mails about the same "case", you will not speed things up but
>> >> just give us more work.
>>
>> > ROTFLMAO! ... let us know how that works out for you, you pathetic
>> > imbecile.
>>
>> Why don't you just be a little more civil?
>
> He can't. Sadly that's the way Eric Ross is. It's also why he's using
>both prof. Jonez and reality check as his nyms.

He's taken to using Reality Check more of late (if replies are an
accurate indication). Since he's undoubtedly tired of my exposing his
racist posts and since he's aware that somewhere between his server
and mine the RC nym and addy is block, he's using it.
That's my theory anyway.

>He hides behing a
>proxy because he knows if his abuses are traced directly to where he
>cowers, someone might bust a few of his bones.

I don't think he's using proxies, though it's possible. He knows
his trying to use servers that don't display his IP doesn't mean he's
anonymous.

>
> He abuses online because his life sucks and he's in reality a coward.

That's the most plausible motivation.

>
>>
>> Maybe it's because you just don't have the ability to debate like a normal
>> person.
>
> True, he doesn't. Also one of many possibilities is that he has poor
>interpersonal skills and this is a way for him to vent his anger. He's
>been doing this crap for years harassing on usenet under multiple
>nyms.

As he loses accounts and/or get kill filed, he MUST change in
order to ensure his hate is seen.

>His abuses are moronic and repetitive and his local poilce
>actually visited him for a talk about his online activity after some
>of his more virulent threats were posted under yet another nym. He
>denies the plice ever visited him but a few days ago made the mstake
>of saying they took notes during their talk with him, a fact that was
>not mentioned before by the complantant.

Yep.
The only person to make mention that notes were taken at the time
of the meeting is Jonezie.
Either he was there or he lied.

>
>>
>> Normal people can disagree without calling people names or making threats.
>> You aparently are not a normal person.
>
>(( SIGH)) Put on youe hip waders. He loves feces.

It's one of the odder fetishes, but he embraces it.
So long as his partner is a consenting adult, it does no harm to
anyone else.




Jonezie:
>> Or you could discuss the holocaust of Native Americans by
>> the invading White Man ...
>

Deadrat:
> Sure. I for Indian or N for Native?

Jonezie:
S for Savage.

Prof. Jonez expressing his racial HATE for Native Americans.
Message-ID: <6b3i56F2svfk5U1@mid.individual.net>

tjab

In article <cevcb415hj2kh0dvqdvcc85upj9do1085s@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 27 Aug 2008 20:17:48 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>> You call them lies, but you know very well they were in fact traced
>>>back to you. At the time of the racist attacks you were living in
>>>Boulder, Colorado, and the posts were traced to that city. According
>>>to Kent
>>
>>Rule #1: Kent Wills always lies.
>
> Prove it.

Been there, done that.

_ Prof. Jonez _

forevernitefan wrote:
> On Aug 27, 11:54 am, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>> On Aug 27, 3:20 am, "Robert D." <Robert...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message
>>
>>>>>> h.. One mail is enough
>>>>>> We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within
>>>>>> 24 hours, but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us
>>>>>> several mails about the same "case", you will not speed things up
>>>>>> but just give us more work.
>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO! ... let us know how that works out for you, you pathetic
>>>>> imbecile.
>>
>>>> Why don't you just be a little more civil?
>>
>>> He can't. Sadly that's the way Eric Ross is.
>>
>> Who's "Eric Ross" ?
>
> You. Having idenity problems agian?
>
>>
>>> It's also why he's using
>>> both prof. Jonez and reality check as his nyms. He hides behing a
>>> proxy because he knows if his abuses are traced directly to where he
>>> cowers, someone might bust a few of his bones.
>>
>> Who's "someone", eh coward.
>
> Any person who might have had enoughof you to track you down for a
> physical meeting. Jonesie.

And who would that be, eh coward?


> As for me being a coward, how ironic since

You're too cowardly to "track me down" even though
you and Kunt Wills claim to know my identity and address.


> you are a coward yourself. I'll send you my physical address so you
> can meet ME face to face when you email me with a valid email and IP
> account.

Post it online coward, or just show the **** up at my address,
which you and Kunt Wills claim to possess from the "police report"
and "notes" of the phantom meeting.


> I'm quite willing to see how you really are when you are
> physically with the person you verbally abuse so hungilly online.

So show up you gutless ****.


>
> So email, me or p rove yoruself the real coward here.

You've got my address (according to the lies you and Kent
have been spewing), so show up anytime, if you've got
the spine.

>>
>> And you again confess Kent's and Your lies about "tracing posts"
>> back to me.
>
>
> You call them lies, but you know very well they were in fact traced
> back to you.

Prove it, you lying ****.


> At the time of the racist attacks you were living in
> Boulder, Colorado,

False.

> and the posts were traced to that city.

Prove the posts were "traced".


> According to Kent ,

Kent's a pathological mythomaniac and convicted felon.


> there are only three people on usenet who obsess about him
> so much that they would take advantage of his vacation period out of
> the country to spew racist death threats against him and his family.

Why would someone wait until Kent was "out of the country" to
make these purported "racist death threats", eh moe?

A "threat" ain't much good if it doesn't make it to the recipient,
now is it moe?

> You thought by the time he returned the racist posts you made would no
> longer be traceable to the city where you live,

You're projecting your pig-ignorance and false assumptions
about the internet again, and the more you do, the more it
appears you were involved in the forged spew.


> You were wrong.

This from the clueless **** who has no idea about
the form or function of basic internet protocols.

> I kept you under your racist act busy posting,

Funny thing moe, since you were the only one
who was online contemporaneously with these
"racist death threats", and the only idiot stupid
enough to (pretend) to engage such obvious
trolling forgeries.


> obtaining more than enough examples for someone
> who knows how to trace repeatedly back to the
> source-- you.

Again your delusions and false assumptions about the
function of usenet/intenet protocols belies your involvement
in the racist spews.

> And you recently made the mistake of saying the police
> that visitied you took notes while they talked with you

You're lying again ****. Kent has made the false claims
that 1) any "talk" too place, 2) he was sent copies of the police "notes"
and that 3) he has a copy of the "police report".

All he has to do is post them if he has them ... but you know
damn well he's lying once again.


> -- a detail
> that was not revealed before. Which, BTW contradicted your claim that
> the local police never paid your a visit over this matter. You proved
> yourself to be a liar.

The only thing proven every time you post is just how utterly ignorant
you are, and what a pathological liar you are.


> You can deny all you want, call us liars and ****s until your
> trollish fingers bleed, and ryto deride me with shit-eating references
> all you want.

OK, roger that.

> In the end you show more of what you are than anything I
> nor Kent can say. And G-d knows what you try to hide. I wouldn't want
> to be you when that time comes, Eric.

Who's "Eric", eh ****?

>
> ******* BRAAAWWWKKK!! Jonesie wants a crappper!!
> BWRAAAWWWWKKK!! Jonesie wants a crapper!!*********
> ---- Norwegian Blue Parrot.
>
> Moe
> Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
> " A vampire cop? REALLY?"
> http://tinyurl.com/forevernitefan
>

_ Prof. Jonez _

Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:37:18 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan
> <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 27, 3:20 am, "Robert D." <Robert...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote in message

>>>>> h.. One mail is enough
>>>>> We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within 24
>>>>> hours, but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us
>>>>> several mails about the same "case", you will not speed things up
>>>>> but just give us more work.
>>>
>>>> ROTFLMAO! ... let us know how that works out for you, you pathetic
>>>> imbecile.
>>>
>>> Why don't you just be a little more civil?
>>
>> He can't. Sadly that's the way Eric Ross is. It's also why he's using
>> both prof. Jonez and reality check as his nyms.
>
> He's taken to using Reality Check more of late (if replies are an
> accurate indication). Since he's undoubtedly tired of my exposing his
> racist posts and since he's aware that somewhere between his server
> and mine the RC nym and addy is block, he's using it.
> That's my theory anyway.

See Rule #1.


>
>> He hides behing a
>> proxy because he knows if his abuses are traced directly to where he
>> cowers, someone might bust a few of his bones.
>
> I don't think

We know.


>
>>
>> He abuses online because his life sucks and he's in reality a coward.
>
> That's the most plausible motivation.

You and "plausibility" have never even been in the same State.

>
>>
>>>
>>> Maybe it's because you just don't have the ability to debate like a
>>> normal person.
>>
>> True, he doesn't. Also one of many possibilities is that he has poor
>> interpersonal skills and this is a way for him to vent his anger.
>> He's been doing this crap for years harassing on usenet under
>> multiple nyms.
>
> As he loses accounts and/or get kill filed, he MUST change in
> order to ensure his hate is seen.

Which accounts have I lost, eh Kunt?

Who's forcing you to read, much less reply, to my posts, eh Kunt?


>> His abuses are moronic and repetitive and his local poilce
>> actually visited him for a talk about his online activity after some
>> of his more virulent threats were posted under yet another nym. He
>> denies the plice ever visited him but a few days ago made the mstake
>> of saying they took notes during their talk with him, a fact that was
>> not mentioned before by the complantant.
>
> Yep.
> The only person to make mention that notes were taken at the time
> of the meeting is Jonezie.

You're lying again, Kunt.

Post the copies of the "notes" *you* claimed were sent to you
by the police.

_ Prof. Jonez _

Robert D. wrote:
> 5.5
> Someone posted articles that do not adhere to your rules. What do I
> do? That depends on the type of offense:

You really are a clueless newbie, aren't you moron?

Robert D.

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message
news:6ho3s5Fn5876U1@mid.individual.net...
> Robert D. wrote:
>> 5.5
>> Someone posted articles that do not adhere to your rules. What do I
>> do? That depends on the type of offense:
>
> You really are a clueless newbie, aren't you moron?
>
5.5
Someone posted articles that do not adhere to your rules. What do I do?
That depends on the type of offense:


a.. Violation of a newsgroup's charter
Please inform the author about the usual conventions via e-mail first -
especially if there are particular features in addition or contrary to the
usual rules in de.*. If this does not work, simply add that author to the
kill file / the filter of your news reader.

b.. Problems with the content of postings
Please clarify your differences with the author directly or use the kill
file / filter of your news reader. In serious cases you can consider legal
procedures, of course.

c.. Substantial abuse (SPAM, rogue cancel)
Please turn to abuse@individual.net in such cases, attaching at least one
complete article header if possible.
What should an abuse report look like so that it can be dealt with most
efficiently?


d.. Choose or adjust the subject of your mail with care
Put something like "Complaint" or "SPAM:" at the _beginning_ of your
subject line if you keep the original subject of the posting. Otherwise we
might mistake your mail for SPAM and delete it unread.

e.. Mail your abuse report to "abuse@individual.net"
Do NOT mail it to "postmaster" or "webmaster". These services (mail and
www) are taken care of by other people so that your abuse report will need
to be forwarded to us.

f.. Tell us the reason for your complaint
It may be obvious for you, but sometimes it is hard for us to quickly
identify the reason for your complaint if you only send us the article in
question. It helps us a lot if you state briefly what you are complaining
about.

g.. Include the Message-ID
To be able to react quickly we need the Message-ID or (even better) the
entire header of the posting in question. You normally do not need to quote
the body of the article.

h.. One mail is enough
We take care of every abuse report. This usually happens within 24 hours,
but may take a bit longer in some cases. If you send us several mails about
the same "case", you will not speed things up but just give us more work.