OzOne wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2008 22:58:38 GMT, "Blue Heeler" <woof@bark.net> wrote:
>
> > OzOne wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22
6
6 GMT, "George W Frost"
> >> <georgewfrost@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Australia is the most overgoverned and overtaxed country,
> >>
> >> Actually that's bullshit!
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Show some proof! Like that's going to happen.......+
Ozwald, for the amount of time you spent trying to desperately google
up some facts to support your bullshit, this is a remarkably poor
offering - did I metnion "even for you"?
>
> Here's some.
> http://www.worldwide-tax.com/
>
> Of coursse you won't accept that......
Nah, IU'll accept the figures gratefully as the lead column deals only
with income tax, although GST/VAT rates are mentioned further across ,
as a measure of the total tax burden it's about as much use as anyh
other of your fanciful pieces of bullshit you try and serve up. In
fact, all it really proves is that you don't have the intelligence to
read past your Google search terms to see if the data your are peddling
even matches the stupid argument you are trying to run.
>
> Maybe Wiki is more your style..unreliable and full of bullshit..
Actually "unreliable and full of bullshit" is you Qzwald - to a tee.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax
A measure of income tax only, and therefore as much use as your claims
to aircraft ownership.
>
> This one where the US rates itself as highest even higher than Japan?
>
> http://www.taxfoundation.org/publica...how/22917.html
A measure of corporate tax rate of developed economies, positioning
Australia at number 11. You did read this after Google found it didn't
you?
And in the unlikely event that you did - it helps your argument how?
>
> http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Taxes/P148855.asp
>
Claims to be a measure of "tax burden" and only quotes income tax
rates. You did read it didn't you?
Do you have any brains at all? Don't answer that, it is obvious you do
not.
> O
>
> Now as for Gov't
> http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups...N/UN-00007.pdf
>
Gee, relatvie sizes of public sector agencies.
That is a measure of tax rate exactly how?
> You can do the rest yourself.......I've held your hand long enough!
If I was going to bother, I'd have to do it from scratch as you have
supplied precisely nothing as usual.
>
> Oh did I mention Go **** Yourself!
>
No you didn't, but thanks for proving yet again that you are a first
class case for post-natal abortion.
You useless, lying, google dependant fool that you are.
--