Daryl Walford wrote:
>John_H wrote:
>
>> Conti on the steers and Double Coin everywhere else is a very popular
>> combination, and has been for some time. I'd also be very surprised
>> if Double Coin (Korean) aren't currently outselling all other brands
>> combined, by a very comfortable margin.
>>
>
>Is "Conti" short for Continental?
Yes.
>If so I don't what their truck tyres are like but I know than when I was
>in the tractor business their tractor tyres were the worst garbage on
>the market.
How times must have changed since the days when Henry switched from
iron wheels to rubber!
Continental tractor tyres (radials) now have an excellent reputation
being widely regarded as second only to Michelin (similar performance
but don't wear quite as well is a typical assessment).
Their motor cycle tyres had an excellent reputation years ago (I
usually ran one on the front of my old RD350 Yammie that got more than
the occasional track workout).
AFAIK their car tyres have always had a good reputation although I've
had no first hand experience.
They're now a very popular steer tyre on trucks, with Michelins having
gone into general disrepute. Personally I've never had a problem with
Michelin on trucks, but the rest get to replace 'em a lot more often
than I do (our two trucks don't do high mileages) so I listen to what
they tell me.
The last set of Michelins I had on the Dunny were absolute shit...
Japanese made and impossible to keep in balance. I also had problems
with ply separations on the last set I had on the F100 (didn't get to
wear out the tread on a single one of 'em). OTOH the set that came
with the Mazda ute are doing exceptionally well.
Now that Michelin tend be made almost anywhere (just like everything
else) I'd suspect that their quality control is now no better than
the best of the rest, and maybe not even as good in some cases.
Conti's are still manufactured in Europe AFAIK.
--
John H