Re: Stone the flamin' wombats! Photo of the Day... Bret the PEDOPHILECHILD-ABUSER at work

16th August 2008, 12:34 AM

GordonLightfootIII wrote,on my timestamp of 15/08/2008 11:25 PM:
> http://wizofoz2k.deviantart.com/art/ID-90027239
>

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/47303086

16th August 2008, 05:27 PM

On Aug 15, 9:30*am, Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/...ools%20out.jpg

16th August 2008, 09:25 PM

Annika1980 wrote:
> On Aug 15, 9:30 am, Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/...ools%20out.jpg

And you posted that link ... why?

Veritas

16th August 2008, 11:35 PM

On Aug 16, 4:17*am, Veritas <ßig@ .ßang.Org> wrote:
> >http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/...ools%20out.jpg
>
> And you posted that link ... why?
>

Because it is on Nuno Souto's site and it is a picture of school-age
children. Therefore, using Nuno Souto logic we must conclude that he
is a PEDOPHILE and a CHILD ABUSER.
Who else would post photos of children on their sites except
PEDOPHILES and CHILD ABUSERS?

17th August 2008, 01:28 AM

Veritas wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
>> On Aug 15, 9:30 am, Noons <wizofo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/...ools%20out.jpg
>
>
> And you posted that link ... why?
>
> Veritas

Why did you?

17th August 2008, 03:00 AM

Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 16/08/2008 10:13 PM:

> Who else would post photos of scared children on their sites except
> PEDOPHILES and CHILD ABUSERS?

No one. So why did you post this:
http://k41.pbase.com/v3/33/20333/1/47303086.skyler3.jpg

Because you ARE a PEDOPHILE and CHILD-ABUSER!
And a well known one to boot: plenty of other examples
in your site.

20th August 2008, 08:19 AM

Annika1980 wrote:
> On Aug 16, 4:17 am, Veritas <ßig@ .ßang.Org> wrote:
>>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/...ools%20out.jpg
>> And you posted that link ... why?
>>
>
> Because it is on Nuno Souto's site and it is a picture of school-age
> children. Therefore, using Nuno Souto logic we must conclude that he
> is a PEDOPHILE and a CHILD ABUSER.
> Who else would post photos of children on their sites except
> PEDOPHILES and CHILD ABUSERS?

You're an idiot.

You are also the one who spends time hunting for pictures of children,
applying your own criterion you must be a paedophile.

Do you really think that every parent who takes pictures of their children
are paedophiles? One of those kids looks like it might be his daughter.

Yes, you are definitely a sick and twisted little cretin. For someone to
take pictures of their kids is absolutely normal behaviour, for someone to
seek out pictures of other people's kids, particularly of people they don't
like, is sick and suspect.

Veritas

20th August 2008, 09:09 AM

On Aug 20, 5:22*am, Veritas <ßig@ .ßang.Org> wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
> > On Aug 16, 4:17 am, Veritas <ßig@ .ßang.Org> wrote:
> >>>http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/...ools%20out.jpg
> >> And you posted that link ... why?
>
> > Because it is on Nuno Souto's site and it is a picture of school-age
> > children. *Therefore, using Nuno Souto logic we must conclude that he
> > is a PEDOPHILE and a CHILD ABUSER.
> > Who else would post photos of children on their sites except
> > PEDOPHILES and CHILD ABUSERS?
>
> You're an idiot.
>
> You are also the one who spends time hunting for pictures of children,
> applying your own criterion you must be a paedophile.
>
> Do you really think that every parent who takes pictures of their children
> are paedophiles? One of those kids looks like it might be his daughter.
>
> Yes, you are definitely a sick and twisted little cretin. For someone to
> take pictures of their kids is absolutely normal behaviour, for someone to
> seek out pictures of other people's kids, particularly of people they don't
> like, is sick and suspect.
>
> Veritas

It's well known this moron is a pedophile and
child-abuser. Most of the people photos in his site
show him for the pervert and depraved little man he is.
But watch his buddy scammers in pbase jump in his
defence very soon.

20th August 2008, 10:02 AM

Veritas wrote:
> Annika1980 wrote:
>> On Aug 16, 4:17 am, Veritas <ßig@ .ßang.Org> wrote:
>>>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~nsouto/...ools%20out.jpg
>>> And you posted that link ... why?
>>>
>>
>> Because it is on Nuno Souto's site and it is a picture of school-age
>> children. Therefore, using Nuno Souto logic we must conclude that he
>> is a PEDOPHILE and a CHILD ABUSER.
>> Who else would post photos of children on their sites except
>> PEDOPHILES and CHILD ABUSERS?
>
>
> You're an idiot.
>
> You are also the one who spends time hunting for pictures of children,
> applying your own criterion you must be a paedophile.
>
> Do you really think that every parent who takes pictures of their
> children are paedophiles? One of those kids looks like it might be his
> daughter.
>
> Yes, you are definitely a sick and twisted little cretin. For someone to
> take pictures of their kids is absolutely normal behaviour, for someone
> to seek out pictures of other people's kids, particularly of people they
> don't like, is sick and suspect.
>
> Veritas

Hey socky... Bret's been publicly posting photos of his kid looking as
stupid as he is for years. What's wrong with someone posting a link to
them? Oh, I get it... The Internet is a private place,eh?

20th August 2008, 09:33 PM

Shon Kei Picture company wrote,on my timestamp of 20/08/2008 8:54 AM:
> Veritas wrote:
>> You're an idiot.
>>
>
> Hey socky... Bret's been publicly posting photos of his kid looking as
> stupid as he is for years. What's wrong with someone posting a link to
> them? Oh, I get it... The Internet is a private place,eh?

<yaaaaawn>
capable of any original thought, Douggie?
or do you follow sheepeshly when your pbase
troll friends tell you to? never mind, we
all know the answer: you've only been the joke
of the Usenet for years...